linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Corrected GPL license name

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: 
 <170792762708.6252.9827025047407468973.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2024 16:20:27 +0000
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org
To: Gianmarco Lusvardi <glusvardi@...teo.net>
Cc: ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org,
 martin.lau@...ux.dev, song@...nel.org, yonghong.song@...ux.dev,
 john.fastabend@...il.com, kpsingh@...nel.org, sdf@...gle.com,
 haoluo@...gle.com, jolsa@...nel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Corrected GPL license name

Hello:

This patch was applied to bpf/bpf.git (master)
by Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>:

On Tue, 13 Feb 2024 23:05:46 +0000 you wrote:
> The bpf_doc script refers to the GPL as the "GNU Privacy License".
> I strongly suspect that the author wanted to refer to the GNU General
> Public License, under which the Linux kernel is released, as, to the
> best of my knowledge, there is no license named "GNU Privacy License".
> 
> This patch corrects the license name in the script accordingly.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - Corrected GPL license name
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf/c/e37243b65d52

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html