[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPDyKFpNL_zFgzSNgaSRqaH8tDNjwB16ZD1YGwqM64vcQ2oxtA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 17:51:02 +0100
From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
To: Elad Nachman <enachman@...vell.com>
Cc: huziji@...vell.com, adrian.hunter@...el.com, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Fix PHY init timeout issues
On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 at 17:16, Elad Nachman <enachman@...vell.com> wrote:
>
> From: Elad Nachman <enachman@...vell.com>
>
> Fix PHY init timeout issues:
>
> 1. Clock Stability issue causing PHY timeout
>
> 2. Timeout taking longer than needed on AC5X.
> Solve by constantly testing the PHY init bit
> until it toggles, but up to 100X timeout factor.
>
> v2:
> 1) convert polling loop to read_poll_timeout()
> for both patches.
>
> Elad Nachman (2):
> mmc: xenon: fix PHY init clock stability
> mmc: xenon: add timeout for PHY init complete
>
> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-xenon-phy.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
The series looks good to me. Although, I assume we should tag this for
stable kernels too and possibly add a fixes tag?
Moreover, it would be nice to get an ack from Hu Ziji.
Kind regards
Uffe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists