[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240215171740.14550-2-fancer.lancer@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 20:17:26 +0300
From: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>
To: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>,
Alexey Malahov <Alexey.Malahov@...kalelectronics.ru>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...hwell.id.au>,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] mips: cm: Add __mips_cm_l2sync_phys_base prototype declaration
The __mips_cm_l2sync_phys_base() and mips_cm_l2sync_phys_base() couple was
introduced in commit 9f98f3dd0c51 ("MIPS: Add generic CM probe & access
code") where the former method was a weak implementation of the later
function. Such design pattern permitted to re-define the original method
and use the weak implementation in the new function. A similar approach
was introduced in the framework of another arch-specific programmable
interface: mips_cm_phys_base() and __mips_cm_phys_base(). The only
difference is that the underscored method of the later couple was declared
in the "asm/mips-cm.h" header file, but it wasn't done for the CM L2-sync
methods in the subject. Due to the missing the global function declaration
the "missing prototype" warning was spotted in the framework of the commit
9a2036724cd6 ("mips: mark local function static if possible") and fixed
just be re-qualifying the weak method as static. Doing that broke what was
originally implied by having the weak implementation globally defined. Fix
that by dropping the static qualifier and adding the
__mips_cm_l2sync_phys_base() prototype declared in the "asm/mips-cm.h"
header file.
Fixes: 9a2036724cd6 ("mips: mark local function static if possible")
Signed-off-by: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>
---
Note seeing there is no user of the pattern described above we can convert
it to having just weakly defined methods. Let me know if that would be a
better alternative.
---
arch/mips/include/asm/mips-cm.h | 14 ++++++++++++++
arch/mips/kernel/mips-cm.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/mips/include/asm/mips-cm.h b/arch/mips/include/asm/mips-cm.h
index 23c67c0871b1..1f143dfad7a2 100644
--- a/arch/mips/include/asm/mips-cm.h
+++ b/arch/mips/include/asm/mips-cm.h
@@ -33,6 +33,20 @@ extern void __iomem *mips_cm_l2sync_base;
*/
extern phys_addr_t __mips_cm_phys_base(void);
+/**
+ * __mips_cm_l2sync_phys_base - retrieve the physical base address of the CM
+ * L2-sync region
+ *
+ * This function returns the physical base address of the Coherence Manager
+ * L2-cache only region. It provides a default implementation which reads the
+ * CMGCRL2OnlySyncBase register where available or returns a 4K region just
+ * behind the CM GCR base address. It may be overridden by platforms which
+ * determine this address in a different way by defining a function with the
+ * same prototype except for the name mips_cm_l2sync_phys_base (without
+ * underscores).
+ */
+extern phys_addr_t __mips_cm_l2sync_phys_base(void);
+
/*
* mips_cm_is64 - determine CM register width
*
diff --git a/arch/mips/kernel/mips-cm.c b/arch/mips/kernel/mips-cm.c
index 84b3affb9de8..3f00788b0871 100644
--- a/arch/mips/kernel/mips-cm.c
+++ b/arch/mips/kernel/mips-cm.c
@@ -201,7 +201,7 @@ phys_addr_t __mips_cm_phys_base(void)
phys_addr_t mips_cm_phys_base(void)
__attribute__((weak, alias("__mips_cm_phys_base")));
-static phys_addr_t __mips_cm_l2sync_phys_base(void)
+phys_addr_t __mips_cm_l2sync_phys_base(void)
{
u32 base_reg;
--
2.43.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists