linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am654: Drop ti,syscon-rgmii-delay from ICSSG nodes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 23:03:16 +0530
From: "Anwar, Md Danish" <a0501179@...com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
CC: Roger Quadros <rogerq@...nel.org>, MD Danish Anwar <danishanwar@...com>,
        Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
        Conor
 Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski
	<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Tero Kristo <kristo@...nel.org>, <srk@...com>, <r-gunasekaran@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am654: Drop ti,syscon-rgmii-delay from
 ICSSG nodes



On 2/15/2024 10:53 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 10:26:59PM +0530, Anwar, Md Danish wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2/15/2024 9:27 PM, Roger Quadros wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 15/02/2024 12:54, MD Danish Anwar wrote:
>>>> Drop ti,syscon-rgmii-delay from ICSSG0, ICSSG1 and ICSSG2 node as this
>>>> property is no longer used by ICSSG driver.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: MD Danish Anwar <danishanwar@...com>
>>>> ---
>>>>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am654-icssg2.dtso | 2 --
>>>>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am654-idk.dtso    | 4 ----
>>>>  2 files changed, 6 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> What about the DT binding document?
>>>
>>
>> Now I am only removing the property from device tree. Once this proprty
>> is removed from all DTs, in the 6.9-rc-1 I will remove the binding as
>> well so that net people can merge that without getting any errors /
>> warnings.
> 
> Did the binding have the property as mandatory? If so you are probably
> doing this the wrong way around. You should first modify the binding
> to mark it as optional and deprecated. Then modify the .dts{i} files
> to remove it.
> 

No the binding is optional that is why I am removing this property from
DTs first.

>    Andrew

-- 
Thanks and Regards,
Md Danish Anwar