| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID:
<SA1PR10MB64450CA1D56F8873331615BC8C4D2@SA1PR10MB6445.namprd10.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 18:03:04 +0000
From: Praveen Kannoju <praveen.kannoju@...cle.com>
To: Jay Vosburgh <jay.vosburgh@...onical.com>
CC: "andy@...yhouse.net" <andy@...yhouse.net>,
"davem@...emloft.net"
<davem@...emloft.net>,
"edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
"pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rajesh
Sivaramasubramaniom <rajesh.sivaramasubramaniom@...cle.com>,
Rama
Nichanamatlu <rama.nichanamatlu@...cle.com>,
Manjunath Patil
<manjunath.b.patil@...cle.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH RFC] bonding: rate-limit bonding driver inspect messages
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jay Vosburgh <jay.vosburgh@...onical.com>
> Sent: 15 February 2024 12:05 AM
> To: Praveen Kannoju <praveen.kannoju@...cle.com>
> Cc: andy@...yhouse.net; davem@...emloft.net; edumazet@...gle.com; kuba@...nel.org; pabeni@...hat.com;
> netdev@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Rajesh Sivaramasubramaniom <rajesh.sivaramasubramaniom@...cle.com>;
> Rama Nichanamatlu <rama.nichanamatlu@...cle.com>; Manjunath Patil <manjunath.b.patil@...cle.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] bonding: rate-limit bonding driver inspect messages
>
> Praveen Kumar Kannoju <praveen.kannoju@...cle.com> wrote:
>
> >Rate limit bond driver log messages, to prevent a log flood in a
> >run-away situation, e.g couldn't get rtnl lock. Message flood leads to
> >instability of system and loss of other crucial messages.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Praveen Kumar Kannoju <praveen.kannoju@...cle.com>
> >---
> > drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++---------------
> > include/net/bonding.h | 11 +++++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> >
> >diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> >b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c index 4e0600c..32098dd 100644
> >--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> >+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
> >@@ -2610,12 +2610,13 @@ static int bond_miimon_inspect(struct bonding *bond)
> > commit++;
> > slave->delay = bond->params.downdelay;
> > if (slave->delay) {
> >- slave_info(bond->dev, slave->dev, "link status down for %sinterface, disabling it in %d ms\n",
> >- (BOND_MODE(bond) ==
> >- BOND_MODE_ACTIVEBACKUP) ?
> >- (bond_is_active_slave(slave) ?
> >+ bond_info_rl(bond->dev, slave->dev,
> >+ "link status down for %sinterface, disabling it in %d ms\n",
> >+ (BOND_MODE(bond) ==
> >+ BOND_MODE_ACTIVEBACKUP) ?
> >+ (bond_is_active_slave(slave) ?
> > "active " : "backup ") : "",
> >- bond->params.downdelay * bond->params.miimon);
> >+ bond->params.downdelay * bond->params.miimon);
>
> Why not use net_info_ratelimited() or net_ratelimit()? The rest of the bonding messages that are rate limited are almost all
> gated by the net rate limiter.
>
> -J
Thank you for the reply, Jay. Yes, I agree. Used net_ratelimit() and resent the v2 patch. Please review and provide your comments.
>
> > }
> > fallthrough;
> > case BOND_LINK_FAIL:
> >@@ -2623,9 +2624,10 @@ static int bond_miimon_inspect(struct bonding *bond)
> > /* recovered before downdelay expired */
> > bond_propose_link_state(slave, BOND_LINK_UP);
> > slave->last_link_up = jiffies;
> >- slave_info(bond->dev, slave->dev, "link status up again after %d ms\n",
> >- (bond->params.downdelay - slave->delay) *
> >- bond->params.miimon);
> >+ bond_info_rl(bond->dev, slave->dev,
> >+ "link status up again after %d ms\n",
> >+ (bond->params.downdelay - slave->delay) *
> >+ bond->params.miimon);
> > commit++;
> > continue;
> > }
> >@@ -2648,18 +2650,20 @@ static int bond_miimon_inspect(struct bonding *bond)
> > slave->delay = bond->params.updelay;
> >
> > if (slave->delay) {
> >- slave_info(bond->dev, slave->dev, "link status up, enabling it in %d ms\n",
> >- ignore_updelay ? 0 :
> >- bond->params.updelay *
> >- bond->params.miimon);
> >+ bond_info_rl(bond->dev, slave->dev,
> >+ "link status up, enabling it in %d ms\n",
> >+ ignore_updelay ? 0 :
> >+ bond->params.updelay *
> >+ bond->params.miimon);
> > }
> > fallthrough;
> > case BOND_LINK_BACK:
> > if (!link_state) {
> > bond_propose_link_state(slave, BOND_LINK_DOWN);
> >- slave_info(bond->dev, slave->dev, "link status down again after %d ms\n",
> >- (bond->params.updelay - slave->delay) *
> >- bond->params.miimon);
> >+ bond_info_rl(bond->dev, slave->dev,
> >+ "link status down again after %d ms\n",
> >+ (bond->params.updelay - slave->delay) *
> >+ bond->params.miimon);
> > commit++;
> > continue;
> > }
> >diff --git a/include/net/bonding.h b/include/net/bonding.h index
> >5b8b1b6..ebdfaf0 100644
> >--- a/include/net/bonding.h
> >+++ b/include/net/bonding.h
> >@@ -39,8 +39,19 @@
> > #define __long_aligned __attribute__((aligned((sizeof(long)))))
> > #endif
> >
> >+DEFINE_RATELIMIT_STATE(bond_rs, DEFAULT_RATELIMIT_INTERVAL,
> >+ DEFAULT_RATELIMIT_BURST);
> >+
> >+#define bond_ratelimited_function(function, ...) \
> >+do { \
> >+ if (__ratelimit(&bond_rs)) \
> >+ function(__VA_ARGS__); \
> >+} while (0)
> >+
> > #define slave_info(bond_dev, slave_dev, fmt, ...) \
> > netdev_info(bond_dev, "(slave %s): " fmt, (slave_dev)->name,
> > ##__VA_ARGS__)
> >+#define bond_info_rl(bond_dev, slave_dev, fmt, ...) \
> >+ bond_ratelimited_function(slave_info, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
> > #define slave_warn(bond_dev, slave_dev, fmt, ...) \
> > netdev_warn(bond_dev, "(slave %s): " fmt, (slave_dev)->name,
> >##__VA_ARGS__) #define slave_dbg(bond_dev, slave_dev, fmt, ...) \
> >--
> >1.8.3.1
> >
> >
>
> ---
> -Jay Vosburgh, jay.vosburgh@...onical.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists