Message-ID: <ab1f9285-73ba-4b69-8882-0cf08c508e28@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 19:36:29 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@...aro.org>, arnd@...db.de,
 linux@...ck-us.net, wim@...ux-watchdog.org, alim.akhtar@...sung.com,
 jaewon02.kim@...sung.com, semen.protsenko@...aro.org
Cc: alexey.klimov@...aro.org, kernel-team@...roid.com,
 tudor.ambarus@...aro.org, andre.draszik@...aro.org, saravanak@...gle.com,
 willmcvicker@...gle.com, linux-fsd@...la.com,
 linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] soc: samsung: exynos-pmu: Add regmap support for
 SoCs that protect PMU regs

On 08/02/2024 17:16, Peter Griffin wrote:
> Some Exynos based SoCs like Tensor gs101 protect the PMU registers for
> security hardening reasons so that they are only write accessible in el3
> via an SMC call.
> 
> As most Exynos drivers that need to write PMU registers currently obtain a
> regmap via syscon (phys, pinctrl, watchdog). Support for the above usecase
> is implemented in this driver using a custom regmap similar to syscon to
> handle the SMC call. Platforms that don't secure PMU registers, get a mmio
> regmap like before. As regmaps abstract out the underlying register access
> changes to the leaf drivers are minimal.
> 
> A new API exynos_get_pmu_regmap_by_phandle() is provided for leaf drivers
> that currently use syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle(). This also handles
> deferred probing.

I found an issue, which needs new version, so I also found few more nits.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@...aro.org>
> ---
> Changes since v3:
>  - Fix PMUALIVE_MASK
>  - Add TENSOR_ prefix
>  - clear SET_BITS bits on each loop iteration
>  - change set_bit to set_bits in func name
>  - Fix some alignment
>  - Add missing return on dev_err_probe
>  - Reduce indentation in loop
> 
> Changes since v2
>  - Add select REGMAP to Kconfig
>  - Add constant for SET/CLEAR bits
>  - Replace kerneldoc with one line comment
>  - Fix kerneldoc for EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL funcs
>  - remove superfluous extern keyword
>  - dev_err_probe() on probe error
>  - shorten regmcfg name
>  - no compatibles inside probe, use match data
>  - don't mix declarations with/without initializations
>  - tensor_sec_reg_read() use mmio to avoid access restrictions
>  - Collect up Reviewed-by
>  - const for regmap_config structs
> ---
>  drivers/soc/samsung/Kconfig            |   1 +
>  drivers/soc/samsung/exynos-pmu.c       | 235 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  drivers/soc/samsung/exynos-pmu.h       |   1 +
>  include/linux/soc/samsung/exynos-pmu.h |  11 +-
>  4 files changed, 243 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/samsung/Kconfig b/drivers/soc/samsung/Kconfig
> index 27ec99af77e3..1a5dfdc978dc 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/samsung/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/soc/samsung/Kconfig
> @@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ config EXYNOS_PMU
>  	depends on ARCH_EXYNOS || ((ARM || ARM64) && COMPILE_TEST)
>  	select EXYNOS_PMU_ARM_DRIVERS if ARM && ARCH_EXYNOS
>  	select MFD_CORE
> +	select REGMAP_MMIO
>  
>  # There is no need to enable these drivers for ARMv8
>  config EXYNOS_PMU_ARM_DRIVERS
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/samsung/exynos-pmu.c b/drivers/soc/samsung/exynos-pmu.c
> index 250537d7cfd6..b846e343fcdd 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/samsung/exynos-pmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/samsung/exynos-pmu.c
> @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
>  //
>  // Exynos - CPU PMU(Power Management Unit) support
>  
> +#include <linux/arm-smccc.h>
>  #include <linux/of.h>
>  #include <linux/of_address.h>
>  #include <linux/mfd/core.h>
> @@ -12,19 +13,132 @@
>  #include <linux/of_platform.h>
>  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>  #include <linux/delay.h>
> +#include <linux/regmap.h>
>  
>  #include <linux/soc/samsung/exynos-regs-pmu.h>
>  #include <linux/soc/samsung/exynos-pmu.h>
>  
>  #include "exynos-pmu.h"
>  
> +#define PMUALIVE_MASK			GENMASK(13, 0)
> +#define TENSOR_SET_BITS			(BIT(15) | BIT(14))
> +#define TENSOR_CLR_BITS			BIT(15)
> +#define TENSOR_SMC_PMU_SEC_REG		0x82000504
> +#define TENSOR_PMUREG_READ		0
> +#define TENSOR_PMUREG_WRITE		1
> +#define TENSOR_PMUREG_RMW		2
> +
>  struct exynos_pmu_context {
>  	struct device *dev;
>  	const struct exynos_pmu_data *pmu_data;
> +	struct regmap *pmureg;
>  };
>  
>  void __iomem *pmu_base_addr;
>  static struct exynos_pmu_context *pmu_context;
> +/* forward declaration */
> +static struct platform_driver exynos_pmu_driver;
> +
> +/*
> + * Tensor SoCs are configured so that PMU_ALIVE registers can only be written
> + * from EL3, but are still read accessible. As Linux needs to write some of
> + * these registers, the following functions are provided and exposed via
> + * regmap.
> + *
> + * Note: This SMC interface is known to be implemented on gs101 and derivative
> + * SoCs.
> + */
> +
> +/* Write to a protected PMU register. */
> +static int tensor_sec_reg_write(void *base, unsigned int reg, unsigned int val)

Please use the same argument names in all these regmap functions as in
struct regmap_config, so base->context

> +{
> +	struct arm_smccc_res res;
> +	unsigned long pmu_base = (unsigned long)base;
> +
> +	arm_smccc_smc(TENSOR_SMC_PMU_SEC_REG, pmu_base + reg,
> +		      TENSOR_PMUREG_WRITE, val, 0, 0, 0, 0, &res);
> +
> +	/* returns -EINVAL if access isn't allowed or 0 */
> +	if (res.a0)
> +		pr_warn("%s(): SMC failed: %d\n", __func__, (int)res.a0);
> +
> +	return (int)res.a0;
> +}
> +
> +/* Read/Modify/Write a protected PMU register. */
> +static int tensor_sec_reg_rmw(void *base, unsigned int reg,
> +			      unsigned int mask, unsigned int val)
> +{
> +	struct arm_smccc_res res;
> +	unsigned long pmu_base = (unsigned long)base;
> +
> +	arm_smccc_smc(TENSOR_SMC_PMU_SEC_REG, pmu_base + reg,
> +		      TENSOR_PMUREG_RMW, mask, val, 0, 0, 0, &res);
> +
> +	/* returns -EINVAL if access isn't allowed or 0 */
> +	if (res.a0)
> +		pr_warn("%s(): SMC failed: %d\n", __func__, (int)res.a0);
> +
> +	return (int)res.a0;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Read a protected PMU register. All PMU registers can be read by Linux.
> + * Note: The SMC read register is not used, as only registers that can be
> + * written are readable via SMC.
> + */
> +static int tensor_sec_reg_read(void *base, unsigned int reg, unsigned int *val)
> +{
> +	*val = pmu_raw_readl(reg);
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * For SoCs that have set/clear bit hardware this function can be used when
> + * the PMU register will be accessed by multiple masters.
> + *
> + * For example, to set bits 13:8 in PMU reg offset 0x3e80
> + * tensor_set_bits_atomic(ctx, 0x3e80, 0x3f00, 0x3f00);
> + *
> + * Set bit 8, and clear bits 13:9 PMU reg offset 0x3e80
> + * tensor_set_bits_atomic(0x3e80, 0x100, 0x3f00);
> + */
> +static inline int tensor_set_bits_atomic(void *ctx, unsigned int offset,

Usual practice is to rely on compiler to inline, so let's drop the
keyword here.

> +					 u32 val, u32 mask)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +	unsigned int i;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < 32; i++) {
> +		if (!(mask & BIT(i)))
> +			continue;
> +
> +		offset &= ~TENSOR_SET_BITS;
> +
> +		if (val & BIT(i))
> +			offset |= TENSOR_SET_BITS;
> +		else
> +			offset |= TENSOR_CLR_BITS;
> +
> +		ret = tensor_sec_reg_write(ctx, offset, i);
> +		if (ret)
> +			return ret;
> +	}
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int tensor_sec_update_bits(void *ctx, unsigned int reg,
> +				  unsigned int mask, unsigned int val)
> +{
> +	/*
> +	 * Use atomic operations for PMU_ALIVE registers (offset 0~0x3FFF)
> +	 * as the target registers can be accessed by multiple masters.
> +	 */
> +	if (reg > PMUALIVE_MASK)
> +		return tensor_sec_reg_rmw(ctx, reg, mask, val);
> +
> +	return tensor_set_bits_atomic(ctx, reg, val, mask);
> +}
>  
>  void pmu_raw_writel(u32 val, u32 offset)
>  {
> @@ -75,11 +189,41 @@ void exynos_sys_powerdown_conf(enum sys_powerdown mode)
>  #define exynos_pmu_data_arm_ptr(data)	NULL
>  #endif
>  
> +static const struct regmap_config regmap_smccfg = {
> +	.name = "pmu_regs",
> +	.reg_bits = 32,
> +	.reg_stride = 4,
> +	.val_bits = 32,
> +	.fast_io = true,
> +	.use_single_read = true,
> +	.use_single_write = true,
> +	.reg_read = tensor_sec_reg_read,
> +	.reg_write = tensor_sec_reg_write,
> +	.reg_update_bits = tensor_sec_update_bits,

> +};
> +
> +static const struct regmap_config regmap_mmiocfg = {
> +	.name = "pmu_regs",
> +	.reg_bits = 32,
> +	.reg_stride = 4,
> +	.val_bits = 32,
> +	.fast_io = true,
> +	.use_single_read = true,
> +	.use_single_write = true,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct exynos_pmu_data gs101_pmu_data = {
> +	.pmu_secure = true
> +};
> +
>  /*
>   * PMU platform driver and devicetree bindings.
>   */
>  static const struct of_device_id exynos_pmu_of_device_ids[] = {
>  	{
> +		.compatible = "google,gs101-pmu",
> +		.data = &gs101_pmu_data,
> +	}, {
>  		.compatible = "samsung,exynos3250-pmu",
>  		.data = exynos_pmu_data_arm_ptr(exynos3250_pmu_data),
>  	}, {
> @@ -113,19 +257,73 @@ static const struct mfd_cell exynos_pmu_devs[] = {
>  	{ .name = "exynos-clkout", },
>  };
>  
> +/**
> + * exynos_get_pmu_regmap() - Obtain pmureg regmap
> + *
> + * Find the pmureg regmap previously configured in probe() and return regmap
> + * pointer.
> + *
> + * Return: A pointer to regmap if found or ERR_PTR error value.
> + */
>  struct regmap *exynos_get_pmu_regmap(void)
>  {
>  	struct device_node *np = of_find_matching_node(NULL,
>  						      exynos_pmu_of_device_ids);
>  	if (np)
> -		return syscon_node_to_regmap(np);
> +		return exynos_get_pmu_regmap_by_phandle(np, NULL);
>  	return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(exynos_get_pmu_regmap);
>  
> +/**
> + * exynos_get_pmu_regmap_by_phandle() - Obtain pmureg regmap via phandle
> + * @np: Pointer to device's Device Tree node

A bit unusual naming... drop "Device Tree" anywhere here. This is:
"device node holding PMU phandle property"


> + * @property: Device Tree property name which references the pmu

Name of property holding a phandle value

> + *
> + * Find the pmureg regmap previously configured in probe() and return regmap
> + * pointer.
> + *
> + * Return: A pointer to regmap if found or ERR_PTR error value.
> + */
> +struct regmap *exynos_get_pmu_regmap_by_phandle(struct device_node *np,
> +						const char *property)

property -> propname

> +{
> +	struct device *dev;
> +	struct exynos_pmu_context *ctx;
> +	struct device_node *pmu_np;

Reversed christmass tree.

> +
> +	if (property)
> +		pmu_np = of_parse_phandle(np, property, 0);
> +	else
> +		pmu_np = np;
> +
> +	if (!pmu_np)
> +		return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Determine if exynos-pmu device has probed and therefore regmap
> +	 * has been created and can be returned to the caller. Otherwise we
> +	 * return -EPROBE_DEFER.
> +	 */
> +	dev = driver_find_device_by_of_node(&exynos_pmu_driver.driver,
> +					    (void *)pmu_np);
> +
> +	of_node_put(pmu_np);

You are dropping now referencen from np when property==NULL. This does
no look right.

> +	if (!dev)
> +		return ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER);
> +
> +	ctx = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +
> +	return ctx->pmureg;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(exynos_get_pmu_regmap_by_phandle);
> +
>  static int exynos_pmu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {
>  	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> +	struct regmap_config pmu_regmcfg;
> +	struct regmap *regmap;
> +	struct resource *res;
>  	int ret;
>  
>  	pmu_base_addr = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
> @@ -133,13 +331,42 @@ static int exynos_pmu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  		return PTR_ERR(pmu_base_addr);
>  
>  	pmu_context = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev,
> -			sizeof(struct exynos_pmu_context),
> -			GFP_KERNEL);
> +				   sizeof(struct exynos_pmu_context),
> +				   GFP_KERNEL);

Not related here. You could have separate patch for cleanups or just
skip such change.


>  	if (!pmu_context)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
> -	pmu_context->dev = dev;
> +
> +	res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> +	if (!res)
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists