[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zc5mqLS34XIEo36F@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 21:31:52 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Alexey Malahov <Alexey.Malahov@...kalelectronics.ru>,
linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] spi: dw: Add a number of native CS auto-detection
On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 09:00:47PM +0300, Serge Semin wrote:
> Aside with the FIFO depth and DFS field size it's possible to auto-detect
> a number of native chip-select synthesized in the DW APB/AHB SSI IP-core.
> It can be done just by writing ones to the SER register. The number of
> writable flags in the register is limited by the SSI_NUM_SLAVES IP-core
> synthesize parameter. All the upper flags are read-only and wired to zero.
> Based on that let's add the number of native CS auto-detection procedure
> so the low-level platform drivers wouldn't need to manually set it up
> unless it's required to set a constraint due to platform-specific reasons
> (for instance, due to a hardware bug).
..
> + /*
> + * Try to detect the number of native chip-selects if the platform
> + * driver didn't set it up. There can be up to 16 lines configured.
> + */
> + if (!dws->num_cs) {
> + u32 ser;
> +
> + dw_writel(dws, DW_SPI_SER, 0xffff);
GENMASK() ?
> + ser = dw_readl(dws, DW_SPI_SER);
> + dw_writel(dws, DW_SPI_SER, 0);
Would it actually change the physical line state? If so, we may not do this.
> + dws->num_cs = hweight16(ser);
Why 16 and not u16 & dw_writew()/readw()?
> + }
I'm wondering why this can't be the default
num_cs = ...autodetected...
device_property_read(..., &num_cs);
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists