[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <747282644.1027419.1708026133594.JavaMail.zimbra@savoirfairelinux.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 14:42:13 -0500 (EST)
From: Charles Perry <charles.perry@...oirfairelinux.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: mdf <mdf@...nel.org>, Allen VANDIVER <avandiver@...kem-imaje.com>,
Brian CODY <bcody@...kem-imaje.com>, hao wu <hao.wu@...el.com>,
yilun xu <yilun.xu@...el.com>, Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>,
krzysztof kozlowski+dt <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Michal Simek <michal.simek@....com>,
kishore Manne <nava.kishore.manne@....com>,
linux-fpga <linux-fpga@...r.kernel.org>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] dt-bindings: fpga: xlnx,fpga-slave-serial:
rename gpios
On Feb 15, 2024, at 8:32 AM, Rob Herring robh@...nel.org wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 07, 2024 at 01:01:25PM -0500, Charles Perry wrote:
>> By convention, gpio consumer names should not contain underscores
>> (prog_b here) and shouldn't contain active low suffixes (-b here).
>
> Yes, that is the preference, but we are stuck with supporting the old
> name. It is not worth it to carry both in the binding and kernel.
>
> Rob
Ok, I'll go back to "prog_b", "init-b" and drop patch 2 and 3 for v4.
Regards,
Charles
Powered by blists - more mailing lists