[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zc5sMmT20kQmjYiq@google.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 11:55:30 -0800
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Max Kellermann <max.kellermann@...os.com>
Cc: hpa@...or.com, x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arch/x86/entry_fred: don't set up KVM IRQs if KVM is disabled
+Paolo and Stephen
FYI, there's a build failure in -next due to a collision between kvm/next and
tip/x86/fred. The above makes everything happy.
On Thu, Feb 15, 2024, Max Kellermann wrote:
> When KVM is disabled, the POSTED_INTR_* macros do not exist, and the
> build fails.
>
> Fixes: 14619d912b65 ("x86/fred: FRED entry/exit and dispatch code")
> Signed-off-by: Max Kellermann <max.kellermann@...os.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/entry/entry_fred.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/entry_fred.c b/arch/x86/entry/entry_fred.c
> index ac120cbdaaf2..660b7f7f9a79 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/entry/entry_fred.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/entry/entry_fred.c
> @@ -114,9 +114,11 @@ static idtentry_t sysvec_table[NR_SYSTEM_VECTORS] __ro_after_init = {
>
> SYSVEC(IRQ_WORK_VECTOR, irq_work),
>
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KVM)
> SYSVEC(POSTED_INTR_VECTOR, kvm_posted_intr_ipi),
> SYSVEC(POSTED_INTR_WAKEUP_VECTOR, kvm_posted_intr_wakeup_ipi),
> SYSVEC(POSTED_INTR_NESTED_VECTOR, kvm_posted_intr_nested_ipi),
> +#endif
> };
>
> static bool fred_setup_done __initdata;
> --
> 2.39.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists