| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <5f6e505b-78c7-4bb3-ba57-fb7601c80a10@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 11:36:09 +0100
From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
To: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@...aro.org>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
Cc: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>, Kishon Vijay Abraham I
<kishon@...nel.org>, Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>,
linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] phy: qcom: edp: Add set_mode op for configuring
eDP/DP submode
On 15.02.2024 11:35, Abel Vesa wrote:
> On 24-01-29 11:40:24, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>> On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 at 10:06, Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@...aro.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 24-01-29 06:05:09, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 at 02:26, Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@...aro.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Future platforms should not use different compatibles to differentiate
>>>>> between eDP and DP mode. Instead, they should use a single compatible as the
>>>>> IP block is the same. It will be the job of the controller to set the submode
>>>>> of the PHY accordingly.
>>>>>
>>>>> The existing platforms will remain with separate compatibles for each mode.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@...aro.org>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-edp.c | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>>>>> 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-edp.c b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-edp.c
>>>>> index 8e5078304646..af941d6c5588 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-edp.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-edp.c
>>>>> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
>>>>> #include <linux/module.h>
>>>>> #include <linux/of.h>
>>>>> #include <linux/phy/phy.h>
>>>>> +#include <linux/phy/phy-dp.h>
>>>>> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>>>>> #include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
>>>>> #include <linux/reset.h>
>>>>> @@ -68,19 +69,21 @@
>>>>>
>>>>> #define TXn_TRAN_DRVR_EMP_EN 0x0078
>>>>>
>>>>> -struct qcom_edp_cfg {
>>>>> - bool is_dp;
>>>>> -
>>>>> - /* DP PHY swing and pre_emphasis tables */
>>>>> +struct qcom_edp_swing_pre_emph_cfg {
>>>>> const u8 (*swing_hbr_rbr)[4][4];
>>>>> const u8 (*swing_hbr3_hbr2)[4][4];
>>>>> const u8 (*pre_emphasis_hbr_rbr)[4][4];
>>>>> const u8 (*pre_emphasis_hbr3_hbr2)[4][4];
>>>>> };
>>>>>
>>>>> +struct qcom_edp_phy_cfg {
>>>>> + bool is_edp;
>>>>> + const struct qcom_edp_swing_pre_emph_cfg *swing_pre_emph_cfg;
>>>>> +};
>>>>> +
>>>>> struct qcom_edp {
>>>>> struct device *dev;
>>>>> - const struct qcom_edp_cfg *cfg;
>>>>> + const struct qcom_edp_phy_cfg *cfg;
>>>>>
>>>>> struct phy *phy;
>>>>>
>>>>> @@ -96,6 +99,8 @@ struct qcom_edp {
>>>>>
>>>>> struct clk_bulk_data clks[2];
>>>>> struct regulator_bulk_data supplies[2];
>>>>> +
>>>>> + bool is_edp;
>>>>> };
>>>>>
>>>>> static const u8 dp_swing_hbr_rbr[4][4] = {
>>>>> @@ -126,8 +131,7 @@ static const u8 dp_pre_emp_hbr2_hbr3[4][4] = {
>>>>> { 0x04, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff }
>>>>> };
>>>>>
>>>>> -static const struct qcom_edp_cfg dp_phy_cfg = {
>>>>> - .is_dp = true,
>>>>> +static const struct qcom_edp_swing_pre_emph_cfg dp_phy_swing_pre_emph_cfg = {
>>>>> .swing_hbr_rbr = &dp_swing_hbr_rbr,
>>>>> .swing_hbr3_hbr2 = &dp_swing_hbr2_hbr3,
>>>>> .pre_emphasis_hbr_rbr = &dp_pre_emp_hbr_rbr,
>>>>> @@ -162,18 +166,28 @@ static const u8 edp_pre_emp_hbr2_hbr3[4][4] = {
>>>>> { 0x00, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff }
>>>>> };
>>>>>
>>>>> -static const struct qcom_edp_cfg edp_phy_cfg = {
>>>>> - .is_dp = false,
>>>>> +static const struct qcom_edp_swing_pre_emph_cfg edp_phy_swing_pre_emph_cfg = {
>>>>> .swing_hbr_rbr = &edp_swing_hbr_rbr,
>>>>> .swing_hbr3_hbr2 = &edp_swing_hbr2_hbr3,
>>>>> .pre_emphasis_hbr_rbr = &edp_pre_emp_hbr_rbr,
>>>>> .pre_emphasis_hbr3_hbr2 = &edp_pre_emp_hbr2_hbr3,
>>>>> };
>>>>>
>>>>> +static const struct qcom_edp_phy_cfg sc7280_dp_phy_cfg = {
>>>>> +};
>>>>> +
>>>>> +static const struct qcom_edp_phy_cfg sc8280xp_dp_phy_cfg = {
>>>>> + .swing_pre_emph_cfg = &dp_phy_swing_pre_emph_cfg,
>>>>> +};
>>>>> +
>>>>> +static const struct qcom_edp_phy_cfg sc8280xp_edp_phy_cfg = {
>>>>> + .is_edp = true,
>>>>> + .swing_pre_emph_cfg = &edp_phy_swing_pre_emph_cfg,
>>>>> +};
>>>>> +
>>>>> static int qcom_edp_phy_init(struct phy *phy)
>>>>> {
>>>>> struct qcom_edp *edp = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
>>>>> - const struct qcom_edp_cfg *cfg = edp->cfg;
>>>>> int ret;
>>>>> u8 cfg8;
>>>>>
>>>>> @@ -200,7 +214,7 @@ static int qcom_edp_phy_init(struct phy *phy)
>>>>> DP_PHY_PD_CTL_PLL_PWRDN | DP_PHY_PD_CTL_DP_CLAMP_EN,
>>>>> edp->edp + DP_PHY_PD_CTL);
>>>>>
>>>>> - if (cfg && cfg->is_dp)
>>>>> + if (edp->cfg->swing_pre_emph_cfg && !edp->is_edp)
>>>>
>>>> I think (!edp->is_edp) should be enough here.
>>>
>>> Actually, in case of DP, the cfg8 needs to be 0xb7 for sc8280xp, while for sc7280 it should be 0x37.
>>>
>>> So to differentiate between first and second we check if the config
>>> provides a swing_pre_emph_cfg
>>
>> Using swing_pre_emph_cfg to distinguish between those two cases is a pure hack.
>> Is there any sensible meaning behind those bits? If not, just put
>> those values into the configuration data.
>
> So the only thing that I was able to find is that this reg has to do
> with some TX and RX zero bits preamble. It seems it needs to be
> different between DP configurations (with or without swing and pre-emph).
>
> But leaving that aside, unless we add another knob that actually depends
> on swing and pre-emph configuration being available, there is no other
> way around it, for now, at least.
Until we know better, I'd say this hack is fine, but please leave a comment
so that we don't fully forget about it.
Konrad
Powered by blists - more mailing lists