lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <602e4364-c65a-4a32-a411-444a40a5c1d7@collabora.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 11:40:40 +0100
From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
To: Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@...nel.org>,
 Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
 Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/9] drm/mediatek: Do not store struct cmdq_client in
 struct cmdq_pkt

Il 15/02/24 01:49, Chun-Kuang Hu ha scritto:
> MediaTek drm driver has the struct cmdq_client information, so
> it's not necessary to store this information in struct cmdq_pkt.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@...nel.org>

As said in patch [1/9], this should be done in the common function, not in each
copy-pasted function in mtk_drm and mtk-mdp3.

Regards,
Angelo


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ