linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH kernel 1/4] pci/doe: Define protocol types and make those public

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <30824dde-d504-43ff-8f2e-ff948dc800b7@amd.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 22:44:04 +1100
From: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@....com>
To: Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>
Cc: linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
 Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH kernel 1/4] pci/doe: Define protocol types and make those
 public



On 9/2/24 19:52, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 01, 2024 at 09:16:37PM +1100, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>> Or the plan is to add pci_doe_secure_transport() to cma.c and force everyone
>> use that?
> 
> Right, the plan is to pass an additional callback to spdm_create()
> which performs a secure transmission.  And cma.c would define that
> to use the separate DOE type.

But it is no use for the TDISP case which won't be calling spdm_create() 
and will have to define CMA_SPDM and SECURED_CMA_SPDM, again.


-- 
Alexey