linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] regulator: lp873x: Use bitfield helpers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMuHMdV-V_Mg-r1T5a_0DjARu-mLJN2uV5fvv8vVzKhvz=6eLQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 14:32:42 +0100
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: J Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com>, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] regulator: lp873x: Use bitfield helpers

Hi Mark,

On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 2:13 PM Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 02:09:18PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > Use the FIELD_PREP() helper, instead open-coding the same operation.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
> > Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
>
> Presumably there's some dependency or something which means I would have
> acked this rather than applying it?

Not that I am aware of.

Looking at [1], presumably you were misguided by the bogus threading?
(due to an attempt of mine to send several patches with a single
 git-send-email command? I don't remember)

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/YZvGFHLWf3GM1jVl@sirena.org.uk

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68korg

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds