[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240215140638.GA4162082-robh@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 08:06:38 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
Cc: chrome-platform@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
patches@...ts.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Pin-yen Lin <treapking@...omium.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>,
Benson Leung <bleung@...omium.org>,
Guenter Roeck <groeck@...omium.org>, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/22] dt-bindings: gpio: Add binding for ChromeOS EC
GPIO controller
On Fri, Feb 09, 2024 at 11:09:12PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> The ChromeOS embedded controller (EC) supports setting the state of
> GPIOs when the system is unlocked, and getting the state of GPIOs in all
> cases. The GPIOs are on the EC itself, so the EC acts similar to a GPIO
> expander. Add a binding to describe these GPIOs in DT so that other
> devices described in DT can read the GPIOs on the EC.
>
> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
> Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
> Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
> Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>
> Cc: Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>
> Cc: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>
> Cc: Benson Leung <bleung@...omium.org>
> Cc: Guenter Roeck <groeck@...omium.org>
> Cc: <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>
> Cc: <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
> Cc: <chrome-platform@...ts.linux.dev>
> Cc: Pin-yen Lin <treapking@...omium.org>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
> ---
> .../bindings/gpio/google,cros-ec-gpio.yaml | 49 +++++++++++++++++++
> .../bindings/mfd/google,cros-ec.yaml | 3 ++
> 2 files changed, 52 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/google,cros-ec-gpio.yaml
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/google,cros-ec-gpio.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/google,cros-ec-gpio.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..a9f1d7784070
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/google,cros-ec-gpio.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/gpio/google,cros-ec-gpio.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: GPIOs controlled by ChromeOS EC
> +
> +maintainers:
> + - Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
> +
> +description:
> + Google's ChromeOS EC has a gpio controller inside the Embedded Controller
> + (EC) and controlled via a host-command interface. The node for this
> + device should be under a cros-ec node like google,cros-ec-spi.
Why do we need a child node here?
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists