[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <mafs0eddc8kru.fsf@amazon.de>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2024 16:57:09 +0100
From: Pratyush Yadav <ptyadav@...zon.de>
To: Alexander Graf <graf@...zon.com>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-mm@...ck.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <kexec@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, <x86@...nel.org>, Eric Biederman
<ebiederm@...ssion.com>, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Andy Lutomirski
<luto@...nel.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Steven Rostedt
<rostedt@...dmis.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, "Mark
Rutland" <mark.rutland@....com>, Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
Ashish Kalra <ashish.kalra@....com>, James Gowans <jgowans@...zon.com>,
Stanislav Kinsburskii <skinsburskii@...ux.microsoft.com>, <arnd@...db.de>,
<pbonzini@...hat.com>, <madvenka@...ux.microsoft.com>, Anthony Yznaga
<anthony.yznaga@...cle.com>, Usama Arif <usama.arif@...edance.com>, "David
Woodhouse" <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
<benh@...nel.crashing.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, "Krzysztof
Kozlowski" <krzk@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/17] kexec: Add KHO parsing support
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 17 2024, Alexander Graf wrote:
> When we have a KHO kexec, we get a device tree, mem cache and scratch
> region to populate the state of the system. Provide helper functions
> that allow architecture code to easily handle memory reservations based
> on them and give device drivers visibility into the KHO DT and memory
> reservations so they can recover their own state.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <graf@...zon.com>
>
> ---
>
[...]
> +/**
> + * kho_return_mem - Notify the kernel that initially reserved memory is no
> + * longer needed. When the last consumer of a page returns their mem, kho
> + * returns the page to the buddy allocator as free page.
> + */
> +void kho_return_mem(const struct kho_mem *mem)
> +{
> + uint64_t start_pfn, end_pfn, pfn;
> +
> + start_pfn = PFN_DOWN(mem->addr);
> + end_pfn = PFN_UP(mem->addr + mem->len);
> +
> + for (pfn = start_pfn; pfn < end_pfn; pfn++)
> + kho_return_pfn(pfn);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kho_return_mem);
> +
> +static void kho_claim_pfn(ulong pfn)
> +{
> + struct page *page = pfn_to_page(pfn);
> +
> + WARN_ON(!page);
> + if (WARN_ON(page_count(page) != 1))
> + pr_err("Claimed non kho pfn %lx", pfn);
You do sanity checks but then never actually change anything on the
page. kho_claim_mem()'s documentation says: "This function removes the
reserved state for all pages that the mem spans". So this function
should at the very least call ClearPageReserved().
Also, checking the page count is a very rough heuristic. There can be
other non-KHO pages with page count == 1. Do you think it would make
more sense to use one of the private pageflags bits to mark a page
KHO-owned? If not, shouldn't you at least also check if the page is
reserved?
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * kho_claim_mem - Notify the kernel that a handed over memory range is now in
> + * use by a kernel subsystem and considered an allocated page. This function
> + * removes the reserved state for all pages that the mem spans.
> + */
> +void *kho_claim_mem(const struct kho_mem *mem)
> +{
> + u64 start_pfn, end_pfn, pfn;
> + void *va = __va(mem->addr);
> +
> + start_pfn = PFN_DOWN(mem->addr);
> + end_pfn = PFN_UP(mem->addr + mem->len);
> +
> + for (pfn = start_pfn; pfn < end_pfn; pfn++)
> + kho_claim_pfn(pfn);
> +
> + return va;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kho_claim_mem);
> +
[...]
--
Regards,
Pratyush Yadav
Amazon Development Center Germany GmbH
Krausenstr. 38
10117 Berlin
Geschaeftsfuehrung: Christian Schlaeger, Jonathan Weiss
Eingetragen am Amtsgericht Charlottenburg unter HRB 149173 B
Sitz: Berlin
Ust-ID: DE 289 237 879
Powered by blists - more mailing lists