[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240216-unlocking-cinnamon-54ab3d755cfd@spud>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2024 19:42:15 +0000
From: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
Cc: Marco Felsch <m.felsch@...gutronix.de>, puranjay12@...il.com,
lars@...afoo.de, robh+dt@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...gutronix.de,
thomas.haemmerle@...ca-geosystems.com
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: iio: ti,tmp117: add vcc supply
binding
On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 11:21:20AM +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Feb 2024 11:28:19 +0100
> Marco Felsch <m.felsch@...gutronix.de> wrote:
>
> > From: Thomas Haemmerle <thomas.haemmerle@...ca-geosystems.com>
> >
> > Add the binding to specify the vcc supply. We can't make it required
> > since this would break the backward compatibility.
>
> Given convention for supplies like this is to make them required in
> the dt-binding to reflect that providing power is not optional (unlikely
> some other supplies that might not be wired up) and not worry about the
> fact that we happily provide dummy supplies for them if they aren't in a
> particular dts, it should be fine to make it required here.
With the suggested change,
Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
Cheers,
Conor.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists