[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zc_Y41y_hOqsmsDx@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2024 21:51:31 +0000
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Sidhartha Kumar <sidhartha.kumar@...cle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, apopple@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] mm/migrate_device: further convert
migrate_device_unmap() to folios
On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 01:13:16PM -0800, Sidhartha Kumar wrote:
> migrate_device_unmap() already has a folio, we can use the folio
> versions of is_zone_device_page() and putback_lru_page.
> - if (page_mapped(page) ||
> - !migrate_vma_check_page(page, fault_page)) {
> - if (!is_zone_device_page(page)) {
> - get_page(page);
> - putback_lru_page(page);
> + if (folio_mapped(folio) ||
> + !migrate_vma_check_page(&folio->page, fault_page)) {
> + if (!folio_is_zone_device(folio)) {
> + folio_get(folio);
> + folio_putback_lru(folio);
page_mapped() is not the same thing as folio_mapped(page_folio(page)).
please include some argumentation about why this is a correct
transformation to make.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists