linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] PCI: Increase maximum PCIe physical function number to 7 for non-ARI devices

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240216224109.GA1359930@bhelgaas>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2024 16:41:09 -0600
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
To: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Bean Huo <beanhuo@...pp.de>, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
	schnelle@...ux.ibm.com, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Bean Huo <beanhuo@...ron.com>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] PCI: Increase maximum PCIe physical function number
 to 7 for non-ARI devices

On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 02:26:47PM -0800, Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan wrote:
> 
> On 2/16/24 11:01 AM, Bean Huo wrote:
> > From: Bean Huo <beanhuo@...ron.com>
> >
> > The PCIe specification allows up to 8 Physical Functions (PFs) per endpoint
> > when ARI (Alternative Routing-ID Interpretation) is not supported. Previously,
> > our implementation erroneously limited the maximum number of PFs to 7 for
> > endpoints without ARI support.
> I would quote specification reference here, like below:
> 
> As per PCIe specification r6.2, sec titled "Alternative Routing-ID
> Interpretation (ARI)", up to 8 [fn # 0..7] functions are allowed in
> an non ARI capable device.

That's fine, just know that I silently convert citations like that
to "PCIe r6.2, sec 6.13" because I don't like having to grep for the
text ;)

Bjorn