[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zc8UPuzii_5gTsrJ@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2024 08:52:30 +0100
From: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>
To: Byungchul Park <byungchul@...com>
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com, mgorman@...e.de,
bristot@...hat.com, vschneid@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
kernel_team@...ynix.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/numa, mm: do not promote folios to nodes not set
N_MEMORY
On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 04:07:54PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
> For normal numa nodes, node_data[] is initialized at alloc_node_data(),
> but it's not for memoryless node. However, the node *gets onlined* at
> init_cpu_to_node().
>
> Let's look at back free_area_init(). free_area_init_node() will be called
> with node_data[] not set yet, because it's already *onlined*. So
> ->zone_pgdat cannot be initialized properly in the path you mentioned.
I am might be missing something., so bear with me.
free_area_init() gets called before init_cpu_to_node() does.
free_area_init_node() gets called on every possible node.
free_area_init_node then() does
pg_data_t *pgdat = NODE_DATA(nid);,
and then we call free_area_init_core().
free_area_init_core() does
free_area_init_core() does
zone_init_internals()
which ends up doing zone->zone_pgdat = NODE_DATA(nid);
If node_data[] was not set at all, we would already blow up when doing
the first
for_each_node()
pgdat = NODE_DATA(nid);
free_area_init_node(nid);
back in free_area_init().
--
Oscar Salvador
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists