linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: iio: ti,tmp117: add vcc supply binding

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f42ebeb2-9ece-4e0d-b91d-4a0076fe7c8f@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2024 09:10:57 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Marco Felsch <m.felsch@...gutronix.de>, puranjay12@...il.com,
 jic23@...nel.org, lars@...afoo.de
Cc: thomas.haemmerle@...ca-geosystems.com, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...gutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: iio: ti,tmp117: add vcc supply binding

On 15/02/2024 21:47, Marco Felsch wrote:
> From: Thomas Haemmerle <thomas.haemmerle@...ca-geosystems.com>
> 
> Add the binding to specify the vcc supply. We can't make it required
> since this would break the backward compatibility.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Haemmerle <thomas.haemmerle@...ca-geosystems.com>
> Signed-off-by: Marco Felsch <m.felsch@...gutronix.de>

Please use scripts/get_maintainers.pl to get a list of necessary people
and lists to CC. It might happen, that command when run on an older
kernel, gives you outdated entries. Therefore please be sure you base
your patches on recent Linux kernel.

Tools like b4 or scripts/get_maintainer.pl provide you proper list of
people, so fix your workflow. Tools might also fail if you work on some
ancient tree (don't, instead use mainline), work on fork of kernel
(don't, instead use mainline) or you ignore some maintainers (really
don't). Just use b4 and everything should be fine, although remember
about `b4 prep --auto-to-cc` if you added new patches to the patchset.

You missed at least devicetree list (maybe more), so this won't be
tested by automated tooling. Performing review on untested code might be
a waste of time, thus I will skip this patch entirely till you follow
the process allowing the patch to be tested.

Please kindly resend and include all necessary To/Cc entries.

Best regards,
Krzysztof