Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2024 09:50:43 +0100
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>
Cc: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
 kent.overstreet@...ux.dev, mhocko@...e.com, hannes@...xchg.org,
 roman.gushchin@...ux.dev, mgorman@...e.de, dave@...olabs.net,
 willy@...radead.org, liam.howlett@...cle.com, corbet@....net,
 void@...ifault.com, peterz@...radead.org, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
 catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org, arnd@...db.de, tglx@...utronix.de,
 mingo@...hat.com, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, x86@...nel.org,
 peterx@...hat.com, david@...hat.com, axboe@...nel.dk, mcgrof@...nel.org,
 masahiroy@...nel.org, nathan@...nel.org, dennis@...nel.org, tj@...nel.org,
 muchun.song@...ux.dev, rppt@...nel.org, paulmck@...nel.org,
 pasha.tatashin@...een.com, yosryahmed@...gle.com, yuzhao@...gle.com,
 dhowells@...hat.com, hughd@...gle.com, andreyknvl@...il.com,
 ndesaulniers@...gle.com, vvvvvv@...gle.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
 ebiggers@...gle.com, ytcoode@...il.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
 dietmar.eggemann@....com, rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com,
 bristot@...hat.com, vschneid@...hat.com, cl@...ux.com, penberg@...nel.org,
 iamjoonsoo.kim@....com, 42.hyeyoo@...il.com, glider@...gle.com,
 elver@...gle.com, dvyukov@...gle.com, shakeelb@...gle.com,
 songmuchun@...edance.com, jbaron@...mai.com, rientjes@...gle.com,
 minchan@...gle.com, kaleshsingh@...gle.com, kernel-team@...roid.com,
 linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 iommu@...ts.linux.dev, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
 linux-modules@...r.kernel.org, kasan-dev@...glegroups.com,
 cgroups@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 13/35] lib: add allocation tagging support for memory
 allocation profiling

On 2/13/24 23:38, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 02:35:29PM -0800, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 2:29 PM Darrick J. Wong <djwong@...nel.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 05:01:19PM -0800, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
>> > > On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 2:40 PM Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 01:38:59PM -0800, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
>> > > > > Introduce CONFIG_MEM_ALLOC_PROFILING which provides definitions to easily
>> > > > > instrument memory allocators. It registers an "alloc_tags" codetag type
>> > > > > with /proc/allocinfo interface to output allocation tag information when
>> > > >
>> > > > Please don't add anything new to the top-level /proc directory. This
>> > > > should likely live in /sys.
>> > >
>> > > Ack. I'll find a more appropriate place for it then.
>> > > It just seemed like such generic information which would belong next
>> > > to meminfo/zoneinfo and such...
>> >
>> > Save yourself a cycle of "rework the whole fs interface only to have
>> > someone else tell you no" and put it in debugfs, not sysfs.  Wrangling
>> > with debugfs is easier than all the macro-happy sysfs stuff; you don't
>> > have to integrate with the "device" model; and there is no 'one value
>> > per file' rule.
>> 
>> Thanks for the input. This file used to be in debugfs but reviewers
>> felt it belonged in /proc if it's to be used in production
>> environments. Some distros (like Android) disable debugfs in
>> production.
> 
> FWIW, I agree debugfs is not right. If others feel it's right in /proc,
> I certainly won't NAK -- it's just been that we've traditionally been
> trying to avoid continuing to pollute the top-level /proc and instead
> associate new things with something in /sys.

Sysfs is really a "one value per file" thing though. /proc might be ok for a
single overview file.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists