linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] sched/numa, mm: do not promote folios to nodes not set N

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240216092305.GC75176@system.software.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2024 18:23:05 +0900
From: Byungchul Park <byungchul@...com>
To: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
	vincent.guittot@...aro.org, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
	rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com, mgorman@...e.de,
	bristot@...hat.com, vschneid@...hat.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	kernel_team@...ynix.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/numa, mm: do not promote folios to nodes not set
 N_MEMORY

On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 06:11:40PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 08:52:30AM +0100, Oscar Salvador wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 04:07:54PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
> > > For normal numa nodes, node_data[] is initialized at alloc_node_data(),
> > > but it's not for memoryless node. However, the node *gets onlined* at
> > > init_cpu_to_node().
> > > 
> > > Let's look at back free_area_init(). free_area_init_node() will be called
> > > with node_data[] not set yet, because it's already *onlined*. So
> > > ->zone_pgdat cannot be initialized properly in the path you mentioned.
> > 
> > I am might be missing something., so bear with me.
> > 
> > free_area_init() gets called before init_cpu_to_node() does.
> > free_area_init_node() gets called on every possible node.
> > 
> > free_area_init_node then() does
> > 
> >  pg_data_t *pgdat = NODE_DATA(nid);,
> > 
> > and then we call free_area_init_core().
> > 
> > free_area_init_core() does
> > 
> >  free_area_init_core() does
> >   zone_init_internals()
> > 
> > which ends up doing zone->zone_pgdat = NODE_DATA(nid);
> > 
> > If node_data[] was not set at all, we would already blow up when doing
> > the first
> > 
> >   for_each_node()
> >     pgdat = NODE_DATA(nid);
> >     free_area_init_node(nid);
> > 
> > back in free_area_init().
> 
> It seems that I got it wrong about the reason. Let me check it again and
> share the reason.
> 
> Just in case, this patch is still definitely necessary tho.

Sorry for the confusing expression. Please don't misunderstand it. The
oops has been always observed in the configuration that I descriped. I
meant:

   Just in case, I need to say the fix is still necessary.

	Byungchul