linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v3] platform/x86/fujitsu-laptop: Add battery charge control support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <77f71c25-a3d5-225e-9fc4-1b9d8ad3797d@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2024 11:27:40 +0200 (EET)
From: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Szilard Fabian <szfabian@...emarch.art>
cc: W_Armin@....de, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>, jwoithe@...t42.net, 
    LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3] platform/x86/fujitsu-laptop: Add battery charge
 control support

On Thu, 15 Feb 2024, Szilard Fabian wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 12:34:00PM +0100, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> > Why is this posted as RFC?
>
> It's my third patch into the Linux kernel (the first two being a i8042 quirk
> table related patch) and I was not sure if everything is okay with v1/v2.
> But it looks like the patch matured enough in v3 to reach it's near final
> form and there was not too much to comment anymore. Sorry for any
> inconvenience I've caused with that.

No problem. I asked just to gauge if there was something you still planned 
to do in addition to what is there. I kind of guessed that in this case 
"RFC" mostly meant "I'm being careful here" more than that you'd have 
something you felt still missing from the patch. :-)

-- 
 i.

> Thanks for your feedback. I'll post v4 in a moment.
> 
> Regards,
> Szilard
> 
>