Message-ID: <CAGsJ_4x6z48N9Sq1V8Bn16eSdRAjBcy3=O_a2iizg=D-tPng=Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2024 23:10:04 +1300
From: Barry Song <21cnbao@...il.com>
To: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@...gle.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, davem@...emloft.net, hannes@...xchg.org, 
	herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, 
	nphamcs@...il.com, zhouchengming@...edance.com, chriscli@...gle.com, 
	chrisl@...nel.org, ddstreet@...e.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	sjenning@...hat.com, vitaly.wool@...sulko.com, 
	Barry Song <v-songbaohua@...o.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] mm/zswap: remove the memcpy if acomp is not sleepable

On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 9:30 PM Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 05:08:14PM +1300, Barry Song wrote:
> > From: Barry Song <v-songbaohua@...o.com>
> >
> > Most compressors are actually CPU-based and won't sleep during
> > compression and decompression. We should remove the redundant
> > memcpy for them.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Barry Song <v-songbaohua@...o.com>
> > Tested-by: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@...edance.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@...il.com>
> > ---
> >  mm/zswap.c | 6 ++++--
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/zswap.c b/mm/zswap.c
> > index 350dd2fc8159..6319d2281020 100644
> > --- a/mm/zswap.c
> > +++ b/mm/zswap.c
> > @@ -168,6 +168,7 @@ struct crypto_acomp_ctx {
> >       struct crypto_wait wait;
> >       u8 *buffer;
> >       struct mutex mutex;
> > +     bool is_sleepable;
> >  };
> >
> >  /*
> > @@ -716,6 +717,7 @@ static int zswap_cpu_comp_prepare(unsigned int cpu, struct hlist_node *node)
> >               goto acomp_fail;
> >       }
> >       acomp_ctx->acomp = acomp;
> > +     acomp_ctx->is_sleepable = acomp_is_sleepable(acomp);
>
> Just one question here. In patch 1, sleepable seems to mean "not async".
> IIUC, even a synchronous algorithm may sleep (e.g. if there is a
> cond_resched or waiting for a mutex). Does sleepable in acomp terms the
> same as "atomic" in scheduling/preemption terms?

I think the answer is yes though async and sleepable are slightly
different semantically
generally speaking. but for comp cases, they are equal.

We have two backends for compression/ decompression - scomp and acomp. if comp
is using scomp backend, we can safely think they are not sleepable at
least from the
below three facts.

1. in zRAM, we are using scomp APIs only - crypto_comp_decompress()/
crypto_comp_compress(),  which are definitely scomp, we have never considered
sleeping problem in zram drivers:
static int zram_read_from_zspool(struct zram *zram, struct page *page,
                                 u32 index)
{
        struct zcomp_strm *zstrm;
        unsigned long handle;
        unsigned int size;
        void *src, *dst;
        u32 prio;
        int ret;

        handle = zram_get_handle(zram, index);
        ...
        src = zs_map_object(zram->mem_pool, handle, ZS_MM_RO);
        if (size == PAGE_SIZE) {
                dst = kmap_local_page(page);
                memcpy(dst, src, PAGE_SIZE);
                kunmap_local(dst);
                ret = 0;
        } else {
                dst = kmap_local_page(page);
                ret = zcomp_decompress(zstrm, src, size, dst);
                kunmap_local(dst);
                zcomp_stream_put(zram->comps[prio]);
        }
        zs_unmap_object(zram->mem_pool, handle);
        return ret;
}

2. zswap used to only support scomp before we moved to use
crypto_acomp_compress()
and crypto_acomp_decompress() APIs whose backends can be either scomp
or acomp, thus new hardware-based compression drivers can be used in zswap.

But before we moved to these new APIs in commit  1ec3b5fe6eec782 ("mm/zswap:
move to use crypto_acomp API for hardware acceleration") , zswap had
never considered
sleeping problems just like zRAM.

3. There is no sleeping in drivers using scomp backend.

$ git grep crypto_register_scomp
crypto/842.c:   ret = crypto_register_scomp(&scomp);
crypto/deflate.c:       ret = crypto_register_scomp(&scomp);
crypto/lz4.c:   ret = crypto_register_scomp(&scomp);
crypto/lz4hc.c: ret = crypto_register_scomp(&scomp);
crypto/lzo-rle.c:       ret = crypto_register_scomp(&scomp);
crypto/lzo.c:   ret = crypto_register_scomp(&scomp);
crypto/zstd.c:  ret = crypto_register_scomp(&scomp);
drivers/crypto/cavium/zip/zip_main.c:   ret =
crypto_register_scomp(&zip_scomp_deflate);
drivers/crypto/cavium/zip/zip_main.c:   ret =
crypto_register_scomp(&zip_scomp_lzs);

which are the most common cases.

>
> Also, was this tested with debug options to catch any possible sleeps in
> atomic context?

yes. i have enabled CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP=y.

>
> If the answer to both questions is yes, the change otherwise LGTM. Feel
> free to add:
> Acked-by: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@...gle.com>

Thanks!

>
> Thanks!
>
> >
> >       req = acomp_request_alloc(acomp_ctx->acomp);
> >       if (!req) {
> > @@ -1368,7 +1370,7 @@ static void __zswap_load(struct zswap_entry *entry, struct page *page)
> >       mutex_lock(&acomp_ctx->mutex);
> >
> >       src = zpool_map_handle(zpool, entry->handle, ZPOOL_MM_RO);
> > -     if (!zpool_can_sleep_mapped(zpool)) {
> > +     if (acomp_ctx->is_sleepable && !zpool_can_sleep_mapped(zpool)) {
> >               memcpy(acomp_ctx->buffer, src, entry->length);
> >               src = acomp_ctx->buffer;
> >               zpool_unmap_handle(zpool, entry->handle);
> > @@ -1382,7 +1384,7 @@ static void __zswap_load(struct zswap_entry *entry, struct page *page)
> >       BUG_ON(acomp_ctx->req->dlen != PAGE_SIZE);
> >       mutex_unlock(&acomp_ctx->mutex);
> >
> > -     if (zpool_can_sleep_mapped(zpool))
> > +     if (!acomp_ctx->is_sleepable || zpool_can_sleep_mapped(zpool))
> >               zpool_unmap_handle(zpool, entry->handle);
> >  }
> >
> > --
> > 2.34.1
> >

Thanks
Barry

Powered by blists - more mailing lists