[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <CZ6FJ3Z78VWO.242BXKNE6RCUV@bootlin.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2024 11:26:05 +0100
From: Théo Lebrun <theo.lebrun@...tlin.com>
To: "Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>, "Linus Walleij"
<linus.walleij@...aro.org>, "Andi Shyti" <andi.shyti@...nel.org>, "Rob
Herring" <robh+dt@...nel.org>, "Krzysztof Kozlowski"
<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, "Conor Dooley" <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
"Thomas Bogendoerfer" <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>
Cc: <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>, "Gregory Clement"
<gregory.clement@...tlin.com>, "Vladimir Kondratiev"
<vladimir.kondratiev@...ileye.com>, "Thomas Petazzoni"
<thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>, "Tawfik Bayouk"
<tawfik.bayouk@...ileye.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/13] MIPS: mobileye: eyeq5: add resets to I2C
controllers
Hello,
On Fri Feb 16, 2024 at 10:17 AM CET, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 16/02/2024 10:05, Théo Lebrun wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Fri Feb 16, 2024 at 8:59 AM CET, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >> On 15/02/2024 17:52, Théo Lebrun wrote:
> >>> Add resets properties to each I2C controller. This depends on the
> >>> reset-eyeq5 platform reset controller driver.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Théo Lebrun <theo.lebrun@...tlin.com>
> >>> ---
> >>
> >> This should be squashed with previous patch adding i2c controllers.
> >> Don't add incomplete nodes just to fix them in next patch.
> >
> > The goal was to isolate reset phandles to a single patch. The series
>
> That was what you did, not the goal. If that's the goal, then it is
> clearly wrong.
>
> > with this patch dropped works because resets in their default state are
> > deasserted, so this isn't a fix. And it allows testing the series on
> > hardware with only the base platform series, which I found useful.
>
> Series or half-of-series? Anyway, commits must be logical chunks, so one
> chunk is to add I2C controllers, not "part of I2C controllers". DTS is
> also independent of drivers (and it will go via different trees!), so
> whatever dependency you think of, it does not exist.
My reasoning was focused on my point-of-view as a contributor and tester
of the series. Your explanation makes sense; I had never thought this
through from the maintainer's POV.
Thanks,
--
Théo Lebrun, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists