[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <65d005999e39f_6c74529464@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com.notmuch>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2024 17:02:17 -0800
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>, Jonathan Cameron
<Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
CC: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>, Smita Koralahalli
<Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@....com>, <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Dan Carpenter
<dan.carpenter@...aro.org>, Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>, "Mathieu
Desnoyers" <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
<linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] acpi/ghes: Prevent sleeping with spinlock held
Ira Weiny wrote:
[..]
> > As Steve said, tp_printk is a hack (a very useful one) and
> > hopefully no one runs it in production.
>
> OMG... I did not realize what tp_printk() was exactly. I should have
> looked closer.
>
> Do we have evidence of its use in production?
>
> I would love to not have to revert/respin,
The revert is for 2 non-trivial fixes needed in one new feature, lets
just circle back and get it right for v6.9. The tp_printk() was not the
final straw for me.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists