linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] LoongArch: Add pv ipi support on LoongArch VM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4a6e25ec-cdb6-887a-2c64-3df12d30c89a@loongson.cn>
Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2024 11:15:07 +0800
From: maobibo <maobibo@...ngson.cn>
To: WANG Xuerui <kernel@...0n.name>, Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>,
 Tianrui Zhao <zhaotianrui@...ngson.cn>, Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
 Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: loongarch@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 virtualization@...ts.linux.dev, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] LoongArch: Add pv ipi support on LoongArch VM



On 2024/2/15 下午6:25, WANG Xuerui wrote:
> On 2/15/24 18:11, WANG Xuerui wrote:
>> Sorry for the late reply (and Happy Chinese New Year), and thanks for 
>> providing microbenchmark numbers! But it seems the more comprehensive 
>> CoreMark results were omitted (that's also absent in v3)? While the 
> 
> Of course the benchmark suite should be UnixBench instead of CoreMark. 
> Lesson: don't multi-task code reviews, especially not after consuming 
> beer -- a cup of coffee won't fully cancel the influence. ;-)
> 
Where is rule about benchmark choices like UnixBench/Coremark for ipi 
improvement?

Regards
Bibo Mao