linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] dt-bindings: trivial-devices: Add qca,qca4024

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2024 11:29:28 +0100
From: Paweł Owoc <frut3k7@...il.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Robert Marko <robimarko@...il.com>, 
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, 
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, 
	Peter Yin <peteryin.openbmc@...il.com>, 
	Patrick Rudolph <patrick.rudolph@...ements.com>, Michal Simek <michal.simek@....com>, 
	Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>, Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@...tlin.com>, 
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>, Fabio Estevam <festevam@...x.de>, 
	Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@...tq-group.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] dt-bindings: trivial-devices: Add qca,qca4024

Can you point me to some example?

QCA4020 SDK can be found here:
https://github.com/globaledgesoft/Center-Stage/tree/master/QCA4020_sdk/target
and QCA402x Programmer's Guide:
https://usermanual.wiki/Document/80ya121142dqca402xcdb2xprogrammersguide.2006247590
but I don't know if this can be helpful.

On Sat, Feb 17, 2024 at 9:12 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On 16/02/2024 15:47, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On 16/02/2024 14:39, Paweł Owoc wrote:
> >> To be clear, I don't want to add support for the QCA4024, I just want
> >> to use this SoC with its own firmware connected to another SoC
> >> (IPQ8072A) via spi.
> >
> > I know and this does not change what I told you days ago: this is not a
> > trivial device, IMO. Please open the schematics or datasheet and check
> > its pins.
>
> To clarify: this is not a trivial, but "regular" device, so I expect
> standalone binding and at least some basic check whether devices has
> additional resources.
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>