[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <edf95287-4f1d-4aaa-8ff2-d2a4db748311@bytedance.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2024 21:27:40 +0800
From: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@...edance.com>
To: Barry Song <21cnbao@...il.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
hannes@...xchg.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc: nphamcs@...il.com, senozhatsky@...omium.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Barry Song <v-songbaohua@...o.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm: zswap: increase reject_compress_poor but not
reject_compress_fail if compression returns ENOSPC
On 2024/2/17 13:36, Barry Song wrote:
> From: Barry Song <v-songbaohua@...o.com>
>
> We used to rely on the returned -ENOSPC of zpool_malloc() to increase
> reject_compress_poor. But the code wouldn't get to there after commit
> 744e1885922a ("crypto: scomp - fix req->dst buffer overflow") as the
> new code will goto out immediately after the special compression case
> happens. So there might be no longer a chance to execute zpool_malloc
> now. We are incorrectly increasing zswap_reject_compress_fail instead.
> Thus, we need to fix the counters handling right after compressions
> return ENOSPC. This patch also centralizes the counters handling for
> all of compress_poor, compress_fail and alloc_fail.
>
> Fixes: 744e1885922a ("crypto: scomp - fix req->dst buffer overflow")
> Cc: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@...edance.com>
> Cc: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@...il.com>
> Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>
> Signed-off-by: Barry Song <v-songbaohua@...o.com>
LGTM, thanks!
Reviewed-by: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@...edance.com>
> ---
> -v2:
> * correct the fixes target according to Yosry, Chengming, Nhat's
> comments;
> * centralize the counters handling according to Yosry's comment
>
> mm/zswap.c | 25 ++++++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/zswap.c b/mm/zswap.c
> index 350dd2fc8159..47cf07d56362 100644
> --- a/mm/zswap.c
> +++ b/mm/zswap.c
> @@ -1498,6 +1498,7 @@ bool zswap_store(struct folio *folio)
> struct zswap_tree *tree = zswap_trees[type];
> struct zswap_entry *entry, *dupentry;
> struct scatterlist input, output;
> + int comp_ret = 0, alloc_ret = 0;
> struct crypto_acomp_ctx *acomp_ctx;
> struct obj_cgroup *objcg = NULL;
> struct mem_cgroup *memcg = NULL;
> @@ -1508,7 +1509,6 @@ bool zswap_store(struct folio *folio)
> char *buf;
> u8 *src, *dst;
> gfp_t gfp;
> - int ret;
>
> VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!folio_test_locked(folio));
> VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!folio_test_swapcache(folio));
> @@ -1621,28 +1621,20 @@ bool zswap_store(struct folio *folio)
> * but in different threads running on different cpu, we have different
> * acomp instance, so multiple threads can do (de)compression in parallel.
> */
> - ret = crypto_wait_req(crypto_acomp_compress(acomp_ctx->req), &acomp_ctx->wait);
> + comp_ret = crypto_wait_req(crypto_acomp_compress(acomp_ctx->req), &acomp_ctx->wait);
> dlen = acomp_ctx->req->dlen;
>
> - if (ret) {
> - zswap_reject_compress_fail++;
> + if (comp_ret)
> goto put_dstmem;
> - }
>
> /* store */
> zpool = zswap_find_zpool(entry);
> gfp = __GFP_NORETRY | __GFP_NOWARN | __GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM;
> if (zpool_malloc_support_movable(zpool))
> gfp |= __GFP_HIGHMEM | __GFP_MOVABLE;
> - ret = zpool_malloc(zpool, dlen, gfp, &handle);
> - if (ret == -ENOSPC) {
> - zswap_reject_compress_poor++;
> - goto put_dstmem;
> - }
> - if (ret) {
> - zswap_reject_alloc_fail++;
> + alloc_ret = zpool_malloc(zpool, dlen, gfp, &handle);
> + if (alloc_ret)
> goto put_dstmem;
> - }
> buf = zpool_map_handle(zpool, handle, ZPOOL_MM_WO);
> memcpy(buf, dst, dlen);
> zpool_unmap_handle(zpool, handle);
> @@ -1689,6 +1681,13 @@ bool zswap_store(struct folio *folio)
> return true;
>
> put_dstmem:
> + if (comp_ret == -ENOSPC || alloc_ret == -ENOSPC)
> + zswap_reject_compress_poor++;
> + else if (comp_ret)
> + zswap_reject_compress_fail++;
> + else if (alloc_ret)
> + zswap_reject_alloc_fail++;
> +
> mutex_unlock(&acomp_ctx->mutex);
> put_pool:
> zswap_pool_put(entry->pool);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists