[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202402161607.0208EB45C@keescook>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2024 16:08:46 -0800
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>
Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
mhocko@...e.com, vbabka@...e.cz, hannes@...xchg.org,
roman.gushchin@...ux.dev, mgorman@...e.de, dave@...olabs.net,
willy@...radead.org, liam.howlett@...cle.com, corbet@....net,
void@...ifault.com, peterz@...radead.org, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org, arnd@...db.de,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
x86@...nel.org, peterx@...hat.com, david@...hat.com,
axboe@...nel.dk, mcgrof@...nel.org, masahiroy@...nel.org,
nathan@...nel.org, dennis@...nel.org, tj@...nel.org,
muchun.song@...ux.dev, rppt@...nel.org, paulmck@...nel.org,
pasha.tatashin@...een.com, yosryahmed@...gle.com, yuzhao@...gle.com,
dhowells@...hat.com, hughd@...gle.com, andreyknvl@...il.com,
ndesaulniers@...gle.com, vvvvvv@...gle.com,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, ebiggers@...gle.com, ytcoode@...il.com,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com, bristot@...hat.com,
vschneid@...hat.com, cl@...ux.com, penberg@...nel.org,
iamjoonsoo.kim@....com, 42.hyeyoo@...il.com, glider@...gle.com,
elver@...gle.com, dvyukov@...gle.com, shakeelb@...gle.com,
songmuchun@...edance.com, jbaron@...mai.com, rientjes@...gle.com,
minchan@...gle.com, kaleshsingh@...gle.com, kernel-team@...roid.com,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
iommu@...ts.linux.dev, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-modules@...r.kernel.org, kasan-dev@...glegroups.com,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 13/35] lib: add allocation tagging support for memory
allocation profiling
On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 06:26:06PM -0500, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 02:40:12PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 01:38:59PM -0800, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> > > index ffe8f618ab86..da68a10517c8 100644
> > > --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> > > @@ -770,6 +770,10 @@ struct task_struct {
> > > unsigned int flags;
> > > unsigned int ptrace;
> > >
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_MEM_ALLOC_PROFILING
> > > + struct alloc_tag *alloc_tag;
> > > +#endif
> >
> > Normally scheduling is very sensitive to having anything early in
> > task_struct. I would suggest moving this the CONFIG_SCHED_CORE ifdef
> > area.
>
> This is even hotter than the scheduler members; we actually do want it
> up front.
It is? I would imagine the scheduler would touch stuff more than the
allocator, but whatever works. :)
--
Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists