lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2024 18:39:49 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Krishna Kurapati <quic_kriskura@...cinc.com>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
	Wesley Cheng <quic_wcheng@...cinc.com>,
	Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
	Thinh Nguyen <Thinh.Nguyen@...opsys.com>,
	Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>, Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	quic_ppratap@...cinc.com, quic_jackp@...cinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 0/9] Add multiport support for DWC3 controllers

On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 06:27:47AM +0530, Krishna Kurapati wrote:
> Currently the DWC3 driver supports only single port controller which
> requires at most two PHYs ie HS and SS PHYs. There are SoCs that has
> DWC3 controller with multiple ports that can operate in host mode.
> Some of the port supports both SS+HS and other port supports only HS
> mode.
> 
> This change primarily refactors the Phy logic in core driver to allow
> multiport support with Generic Phy's.
> 
> Changes have been tested on  QCOM SoC SA8295P which has 4 ports (2
> are HS+SS capable and 2 are HS only capable).

I've dropped these all from my queue (see the other private email thread
on the commit response).  Please resend when you address the issues
Johan raised.

And note, please do NOT attempt to poke maintainers in private bug
reports to do reviews as that is not how any of this happens, you know
this quite well.

thanks,

greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ