[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202402180238.NhuqK3LQ-lkp@intel.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2024 02:41:42 +0800
From: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To: Md Sadre Alam <quic_mdalam@...cinc.com>, andersson@...nel.org,
konrad.dybcio@...aro.org, broonie@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
miquel.raynal@...tlin.com, richard@....at, vigneshr@...com,
manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: llvm@...ts.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev,
quic_srichara@...cinc.com, quic_varada@...cinc.com,
quic_mdalam@...cinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] spi: spi-qpic: Add qpic spi nand driver support
Hi Md,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
[auto build test WARNING on next-20240215]
[also build test WARNING on linus/master v6.8-rc4]
[cannot apply to mtd/nand/next broonie-spi/for-next robh/for-next v6.8-rc4 v6.8-rc3 v6.8-rc2]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Md-Sadre-Alam/spi-dt-bindings-add-binding-doc-for-spi-qpic-snand/20240215-215348
base: next-20240215
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240215134856.1313239-4-quic_mdalam%40quicinc.com
patch subject: [PATCH 3/5] spi: spi-qpic: Add qpic spi nand driver support
config: arm-defconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240218/202402180238.NhuqK3LQ-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 14.0.6 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git f28c006a5895fc0e329fe15fead81e37457cb1d1)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240218/202402180238.NhuqK3LQ-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202402180238.NhuqK3LQ-lkp@intel.com/
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> drivers/spi/spi-qpic-snand.c:161:7: warning: variable 'ecc_user' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
bool ecc_user = false;
^
>> drivers/spi/spi-qpic-snand.c:160:35: warning: variable 'desired_correction' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
int step_size = 0, strength = 0, desired_correction = 0, steps;
^
>> drivers/spi/spi-qpic-snand.c:399:6: warning: variable 'oob_buf' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
u8 *oob_buf;
^
>> drivers/spi/spi-qpic-snand.c:452:30: warning: variable 'erased' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
bool serial_op_err = false, erased;
^
drivers/spi/spi-qpic-snand.c:682:16: error: assigning to 'u8 *' (aka 'unsigned char *') from 'const void *const' discards qualifiers [-Werror,-Wincompatible-pointer-types-discards-qualifiers]
snandc->wbuf = op->data.buf.out;
^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
4 warnings and 1 error generated.
vim +/ecc_user +161 drivers/spi/spi-qpic-snand.c
152
153 static int qpic_snand_ecc_init_ctx_pipelined(struct nand_device *nand)
154 {
155 struct qcom_nand_controller *snandc = nand_to_qcom_snand(nand);
156 struct nand_ecc_props *conf = &nand->ecc.ctx.conf;
157 struct nand_ecc_props *reqs = &nand->ecc.requirements;
158 struct nand_ecc_props *user = &nand->ecc.user_conf;
159 struct mtd_info *mtd = nanddev_to_mtd(nand);
> 160 int step_size = 0, strength = 0, desired_correction = 0, steps;
> 161 bool ecc_user = false;
162 int cwperpage, bad_block_byte;
163 struct qpic_ecc *ecc_cfg;
164
165 cwperpage = mtd->writesize / NANDC_STEP_SIZE;
166
167 ecc_cfg = kzalloc(sizeof(*ecc_cfg), GFP_KERNEL);
168 if (!ecc_cfg)
169 return -ENOMEM;
170
171 nand->ecc.ctx.priv = ecc_cfg;
172
173 if (user->step_size && user->strength) {
174 step_size = user->step_size;
175 strength = user->strength;
176 ecc_user = true;
177 } else if (reqs->step_size && reqs->strength) {
178 step_size = reqs->step_size;
179 strength = reqs->strength;
180 }
181
182 if (step_size && strength) {
183 steps = mtd->writesize / step_size;
184 desired_correction = steps * strength;
185 }
186
187 ecc_cfg->ecc_bytes_hw = 7;
188 ecc_cfg->spare_bytes = 4;
189 ecc_cfg->bbm_size = 1;
190 ecc_cfg->bch_enabled = true;
191 ecc_cfg->bytes = ecc_cfg->ecc_bytes_hw + ecc_cfg->spare_bytes + ecc_cfg->bbm_size;
192
193 ecc_cfg->steps = 4;
194 ecc_cfg->strength = 4;
195 ecc_cfg->step_size = 512;
196
197 mtd_set_ooblayout(mtd, &qcom_snand_ooblayout);
198
199 ecc_cfg->cw_data = 516;
200 ecc_cfg->cw_size = ecc_cfg->cw_data + ecc_cfg->bytes;
201 bad_block_byte = mtd->writesize - ecc_cfg->cw_size * (cwperpage - 1) + 1;
202
203 ecc_cfg->cfg0 = (cwperpage - 1) << CW_PER_PAGE
204 | ecc_cfg->cw_data << UD_SIZE_BYTES
205 | 1 << DISABLE_STATUS_AFTER_WRITE
206 | 3 << NUM_ADDR_CYCLES
207 | ecc_cfg->ecc_bytes_hw << ECC_PARITY_SIZE_BYTES_RS
208 | 0 << STATUS_BFR_READ
209 | 1 << SET_RD_MODE_AFTER_STATUS
210 | ecc_cfg->spare_bytes << SPARE_SIZE_BYTES;
211
212 ecc_cfg->cfg1 = 0 << NAND_RECOVERY_CYCLES
213 | 0 << CS_ACTIVE_BSY
214 | bad_block_byte << BAD_BLOCK_BYTE_NUM
215 | 0 << BAD_BLOCK_IN_SPARE_AREA
216 | 20 << WR_RD_BSY_GAP
217 | 0 << WIDE_FLASH
218 | ecc_cfg->bch_enabled << ENABLE_BCH_ECC;
219
220 ecc_cfg->cfg0_raw = (cwperpage - 1) << CW_PER_PAGE
221 | ecc_cfg->cw_size << UD_SIZE_BYTES
222 | 3 << NUM_ADDR_CYCLES
223 | 0 << SPARE_SIZE_BYTES;
224
225 ecc_cfg->cfg1_raw = 0 << NAND_RECOVERY_CYCLES
226 | 0 << CS_ACTIVE_BSY
227 | 17 << BAD_BLOCK_BYTE_NUM
228 | 1 << BAD_BLOCK_IN_SPARE_AREA
229 | 20 << WR_RD_BSY_GAP
230 | 0 << WIDE_FLASH
231 | 1 << DEV0_CFG1_ECC_DISABLE;
232
233 ecc_cfg->ecc_bch_cfg = !ecc_cfg->bch_enabled << ECC_CFG_ECC_DISABLE
234 | 0 << ECC_SW_RESET
235 | ecc_cfg->cw_data << ECC_NUM_DATA_BYTES
236 | 1 << ECC_FORCE_CLK_OPEN
237 | 0 << ECC_MODE
238 | ecc_cfg->ecc_bytes_hw << ECC_PARITY_SIZE_BYTES_BCH;
239
240 ecc_cfg->ecc_buf_cfg = 0x203 << NUM_STEPS;
241 ecc_cfg->clrflashstatus = FS_READY_BSY_N;
242 ecc_cfg->clrreadstatus = 0xc0;
243
244 conf->step_size = ecc_cfg->step_size;
245 conf->strength = ecc_cfg->strength;
246
247 if (ecc_cfg->strength < strength)
248 dev_warn(snandc->dev, "Unable to fulfill ECC requirements of %u bits.\n", strength);
249
250 dev_info(snandc->dev, "ECC strength: %u bits per %u bytes\n",
251 ecc_cfg->strength, ecc_cfg->step_size);
252
253 return 0;
254 }
255
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
Powered by blists - more mailing lists