[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20240217213010.2466-1-dsmythies@telus.net>
Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2024 13:30:10 -0800
From: Doug Smythies <dsmythies@...us.net>
To: srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com,
rafael@...nel.org,
lenb@...nel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
dsmythies@...us.net
Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq: intel_pstate: fix pstate limits enforcement for adjust_perf call back
There is a loophole in pstate limit clamping for the intel_cpufreq CPU
frequency scaling driver (intel_pstate in passive mode), schedutil CPU
frequency scaling governor, HWP (HardWare Pstate) control enabled, when
the adjust_perf call back path is used.
Fix it.
Signed-off-by: Doug Smythies <dsmythies@...us.net>
---
drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
index ca94e60e705a..79619227ea51 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
@@ -2987,6 +2987,9 @@ static void intel_cpufreq_adjust_perf(unsigned int cpunum,
if (min_pstate < cpu->min_perf_ratio)
min_pstate = cpu->min_perf_ratio;
+ if (min_pstate > cpu->max_perf_ratio)
+ min_pstate = cpu->max_perf_ratio;
+
max_pstate = min(cap_pstate, cpu->max_perf_ratio);
if (max_pstate < min_pstate)
max_pstate = min_pstate;
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists