linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v9 00/24] x86/resctrl: monitored closid+rmid together, separate arch/fs locking

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2024 16:28:36 -0800
From: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
To: James Morse <james.morse@....com>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
	Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
	H Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>, Babu Moger <Babu.Moger@....com>,
	shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com,
	D Scott Phillips OS <scott@...amperecomputing.com>,
	carl@...amperecomputing.com, lcherian@...vell.com,
	bobo.shaobowang@...wei.com, tan.shaopeng@...itsu.com,
	baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com, Jamie Iles <quic_jiles@...cinc.com>,
	Xin Hao <xhao@...ux.alibaba.com>, peternewman@...gle.com,
	dfustini@...libre.com, amitsinght@...vell.com,
	David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 00/24] x86/resctrl: monitored closid+rmid together,
 separate arch/fs locking

On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 06:44:14PM +0000, James Morse wrote:
> Hello!
> 
> It's been back and forth for whether this series should be rebased onto Tony's
> SNC series. This version isn't, its based on tip/x86/cache.
> (I have the rebased-and-tested versions if anyone needs them)

In case James' patches go first, I took a crack at basing my SNC series
on top of his patches (specifically the mpam/monitors_and_locking/v9
branch of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/morse/linux.git).

Result is here:

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/aegl/linux.git
Branch: james_then_snc

The end result of which ought to be pretty similar to the
"rebased-and-tested" versions that James mentions above.

-Tony