lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240218161435.38312-1-lucasleeeeeeeee@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2024 00:10:30 +0800
From: Lucas Lee Jing Yi <lucasleeeeeeeee@...il.com>
To: rafael@...nel.org
Cc: Perry.Yuan@....com,
	Xiaojian.Du@....com,
	alexander.deucher@....com,
	bp@...en8.de,
	deepak.sharma@....com,
	li.meng@....com,
	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	mario.limonciello@....com,
	nathan.fontenot@....com,
	oleksandr@...alenko.name,
	rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com,
	ray.huang@....com,
	shimmer.huang@....com,
	skhan@...uxfoundation.org,
	viresh.kumar@...aro.org,
	x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V14 0/7] amd-pstate preferred core

Dear all,
I have found an issue with the patchset when applying on 6.7, leading to a large degradation in performance.

On my 7840HS on *STOCK* 6.7 highest_perf is reported as 196, not 166 as assumed in the patchset. Applying the patchset causes highest_perf to be misreported and hence a misreported maximum frequency as well, at 4.35GHz instead of 5.14GHz, leading to the degradation in performance.
However, On my 5950X, highest_perf is indeed reported as 166 before and after applying the patchset.

Hence, I propose the following patch (should be attached).

I do apologize for any mistakes as I am new to this and this is my first email on the mailing list.

Cheers!
Lucas

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ