[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f4e2cd9f-d8d2-4669-9bbc-57f67a24e734@linaro.org>
Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2024 19:10:27 +0000
From: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
To: Danila Tikhonov <danila@...xyga.com>, andersson@...nel.org,
konrad.dybcio@...aro.org, lgirdwood@...il.com, broonie@...nel.org,
robh@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, quic_wcheng@...cinc.com
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] arm64: dts: qcom: pm6150: define USB-C related blocks
On 18/02/2024 6:52 p.m., Danila Tikhonov wrote:
> You are referring to Dmitry Baryshkov, as I see. But Dmitry has already
> reviewed my patch (message above).
Yes we previously debated and discussed verbatim copy of downstream
versus the format we used for 8150b.
The original driver I wrote for tcpm and the dts that went with it
derived from 4.19 where the interrupt definition was already right, so
in that case copy/paste of downstream is fine.
However with earlier kernels, 4.14 in this case the signalling isn't right.
Please read the discussion and reconsider your patch.
> So it would be rude to change anything without his knowledge. Let's wait
> for his answer
He'd have to be arguing against his own patch.....
One final nag - please use the kernel discussion format of bottom not
top posting.
https://git.codelinaro.org/bryan.odonoghue/kernel/-/blob/sc8280xp-v6.8-rc4-camss/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?ref_type=heads
---
bod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists