| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2024 19:10:27 +0000 From: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org> To: Danila Tikhonov <danila@...xyga.com>, andersson@...nel.org, konrad.dybcio@...aro.org, lgirdwood@...il.com, broonie@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, quic_wcheng@...cinc.com Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] arm64: dts: qcom: pm6150: define USB-C related blocks On 18/02/2024 6:52 p.m., Danila Tikhonov wrote: > You are referring to Dmitry Baryshkov, as I see. But Dmitry has already > reviewed my patch (message above). Yes we previously debated and discussed verbatim copy of downstream versus the format we used for 8150b. The original driver I wrote for tcpm and the dts that went with it derived from 4.19 where the interrupt definition was already right, so in that case copy/paste of downstream is fine. However with earlier kernels, 4.14 in this case the signalling isn't right. Please read the discussion and reconsider your patch. > So it would be rude to change anything without his knowledge. Let's wait > for his answer He'd have to be arguing against his own patch..... One final nag - please use the kernel discussion format of bottom not top posting. https://git.codelinaro.org/bryan.odonoghue/kernel/-/blob/sc8280xp-v6.8-rc4-camss/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?ref_type=heads --- bod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists