lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2024 20:34:45 -0800
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@...idpixels.com>,
 LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux FS6712X-EB92 5.13.x - page allocation failure followed by a
 controller reset and the drive drops out of the array

Hi Justin,

On 2/15/24 15:46, Justin Piszcz wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I am using an Asus FlashStor FS6712X-EB92, and was curious why this
> issue keeps happening?  Is this a known issue in 5.13.x?  The last
> time this happened, I had removed the drive, ran a bunch of
> diagnostics on it and used it in another system and it was okay, no
> errors were found.  This is the second instance where there is a page
> allocation failure and a drive drops out of the array.
> 

I can't answer your question. I suggest that you ask it on the
linux-raid@...r.kernel.org  mailing list.

Also, I have one question:

in this log fragment:

[1698614.263935] SLUB: Unable to allocate memory on node -1,
gfp=0x800(GFP_NOWAIT)
[1698614.271680]   cache: skbuff_head_cache, object size: 224, buffer
size: 256, default order: 0, min order: 0
[1698614.281979]   node 0: slabs: 32, objs: 512, free: 64
[1933116.236646] nvme nvme9: I/O 119 QID 2 timeout, aborting
[1933116.242365] nvme nvme9: I/O 120 QID 2 timeout, aborting
[1933141.324640] nvme nvme9: I/O 1 QID 0 timeout, reset controller
[1933146.444701] nvme nvme9: I/O 119 QID 2 timeout, reset controller
[1933215.826997] nvme nvme9: Device not ready; aborting reset, CSTS=0x1

there are roughly 4 days between the 1698614 log entry and the
1933116 log entry. Is that (logging) accurate? Did it miss anything?
It just seems odd to me.


thanks.
-- 
#Randy

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ