[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <66a54c8b-2013-48d9-8114-6f3f72cd2871@arm.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2024 16:53:38 +0000
From: James Morse <james.morse@....com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
H Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>, Babu Moger <Babu.Moger@....com>,
shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com,
D Scott Phillips OS <scott@...amperecomputing.com>,
carl@...amperecomputing.com, lcherian@...vell.com,
bobo.shaobowang@...wei.com, tan.shaopeng@...itsu.com,
baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com, Jamie Iles <quic_jiles@...cinc.com>,
Xin Hao <xhao@...ux.alibaba.com>, peternewman@...gle.com,
dfustini@...libre.com, amitsinght@...vell.com,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 00/24] x86/resctrl: monitored closid+rmid together,
separate arch/fs locking
Hi Thomas,
On 19/02/2024 16:49, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 17 2024 at 11:55, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 06:44:14PM +0000, James Morse wrote:
>>> It's been back and forth for whether this series should be rebased onto Tony's
>>> SNC series. This version isn't, its based on tip/x86/cache.
>>> (I have the rebased-and-tested versions if anyone needs them)
>>
>> The set applied ontop of tip:x86/cache gives:
>>
>> vmlinux.o: in function `get_domain_from_cpu':
>> (.text+0x150f33): undefined reference to `lockdep_is_cpus_held'
>> ld: vmlinux.o: in function `rdt_ctrl_update':
>> (.text+0x150fbc): undefined reference to `lockdep_is_cpus_held'
>
> Wants to be folded into patch 24.
Thanks - I'm just putting a v10 together to fix this.
Thanks,
James
Powered by blists - more mailing lists