| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <87frxo2vhg.fsf@jogness.linutronix.de> Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2024 18:57:23 +0106 From: John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de> To: "John B. Wyatt IV" <jwyatt@...hat.com> Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>, Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>, Juri Lelli <jlelli@...hat.com>, Derek Barbosa <debarbos@...hat.com>, Bruno Goncalves <bgoncalv@...hat.com>, "John B. Wyatt IV" <sageofredondo@...il.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: Automating console_blast.sh On 2024-02-19, "John B. Wyatt IV" <jwyatt@...hat.com> wrote: > I am investigating if we can automate, and, possibly add > console_blash.sh [1] to our test suite here at Red Hat. It is called "console_blast.sh". ;-) > At Red Hat we use SSH to manage our test boxes. On an off-list email > you wrote that 'Only the UART should be used as a console'. I took > this as no ssh session should be used from the boot up until the > crash, but I should have confirmed this. Is this correct? SSH is fine. SSH sessions are not consoles. Consoles are specified with the console= or netconsole= boot argument and receive the kernel messages automatically from the kernel. > The license for our test suite is GPL v3 [2]. May we have your > permission to license it under that or permissive? Yes, GPL v3 is OK. > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rt-users/ZcQjxa4UA6hzXHnU@thinkpad2021/ > > [2] https://gitlab.com/redhat/centos-stream/tests/kernel/kernel-tests/-/tree/main/rt-tests John
Powered by blists - more mailing lists