linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] iio: adc: ad7944: add driver for AD7944/AD7985/AD7986

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240219194650.3e14c877@jic23-huawei>
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2024 19:46:50 +0000
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>
Cc: linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, Michael Hennerich
 <Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Krzysztof
 Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, Conor Dooley
 <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@...log.com>, Liam
 Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] iio: adc: ad7944: add driver for
 AD7944/AD7985/AD7986

On Mon, 19 Feb 2024 13:13:35 -0600
David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 1:47 PM David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com> wrote:
> 
> ...
> 
> > +
> > +#define AD7944_DEFINE_CHIP_INFO(_name, _t, _bits, _sign)               \
> > +static const struct ad7944_chip_info _name##_chip_info = {             \
> > +       .name = #_name,                                                 \
> > +       .t = &_t##_timing_spec,                                         \
> > +       .channels = {                                                   \
> > +               {                                                       \
> > +                       .type = IIO_VOLTAGE,                            \
> > +                       .indexed = 1,                                   \
> > +                       .differential = 1,                              \
> > +                       .channel = 0,                                   \
> > +                       .channel2 = 1,                                  \
> > +                       .scan_index = 0,                                \
> > +                       .scan_type.sign = _sign,                        \
> > +                       .scan_type.realbits = _bits,                    \
> > +                       .scan_type.storagebits = _bits > 16 ? 32 : 16,  \
> > +                       .scan_type.endianness = IIO_CPU,                \
> > +                       .info_mask_separate = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW)    \
> > +                                       | BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE),     \
> > +               },                                                      \
> > +               IIO_CHAN_SOFT_TIMESTAMP(1),                             \
> > +       },                                                              \
> > +}
> > +
> > +AD7944_DEFINE_CHIP_INFO(ad7944, ad7944, 14, 'u');
> > +AD7944_DEFINE_CHIP_INFO(ad7985, ad7944, 16, 'u');
> > +AD7944_DEFINE_CHIP_INFO(ad7986, ad7986, 18, 's');  
> 
> Now that I have been enlightened [1] about pseudo-differntial inputs,
> I'm thinking that AD7944 and AD7985 should not have the .differential
> = 1 flag set since they are pseudo-differential inputs with a ground
> sense on the negative input (and no extra supply needed since it is
> always ground). Does that sound right?

yes

> 
> AD7986 is true differential though, so should be correct already.
> 
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/CAMknhBF5mAsN1c-194Qwa5oKmqKzef2khXnqA1cSdKpWHKWp0w@mail.gmail.com/