lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5b7a6728-0a68-4332-968c-aab84537be73@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2024 09:17:05 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: "Peng Fan (OSS)" <peng.fan@....nxp.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
 Li Yang <leoyang.li@....com>, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
 Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
 Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>, NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: arm: fsl: add i.MX95 19x19 EVK board

On 18/02/2024 07:38, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
> 
> Add DT compatible string for NXP i.MX95 19x19 EVK board.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml | 6 ++++++
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
> index 39378879777b..3b318c518e35 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
> @@ -1264,6 +1264,12 @@ properties:
>                - fsl,imx93-11x11-evk       # i.MX93 11x11 EVK Board
>            - const: fsl,imx93
>  
> +      - description: i.MX95 based Boards

You already have such entry for that fallback. Just add it there... or
you want to say the fallback compatible is wrong? It's anyway weird to
re-use other compatible without 95.

Best regards,
Krzysztof


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ