linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: usb: Add xhci glue driver support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <eeb97fc2-326c-4d0c-97a8-7973e95f8047@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2024 13:18:12 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Puma Hsu <pumahsu@...gle.com>, mathias.nyman@...el.com,
 gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, Thinh.Nguyen@...opsys.com
Cc: badhri@...gle.com, royluo@...gle.com, howardyen@...gle.com,
 albertccwang@...gle.com, raychi@...gle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: usb: Add xhci glue driver support

On 19/02/2024 07:10, Puma Hsu wrote:
> Currently the dwc3 driver always probes xhci-plat driver

Not a DT property, at least at first glance. NAK.

> by hardcode in driver. Introduce a property to make this
> flexible that a user can probe a xhci glue driver by the
> generic dwc3 driver.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Puma Hsu <pumahsu@...gle.com>

Please use scripts/get_maintainers.pl to get a list of necessary people
and lists to CC. It might happen, that command when run on an older
kernel, gives you outdated entries. Therefore please be sure you base
your patches on recent Linux kernel.

Tools like b4 or scripts/get_maintainer.pl provide you proper list of
people, so fix your workflow. Tools might also fail if you work on some
ancient tree (don't, instead use mainline), work on fork of kernel
(don't, instead use mainline) or you ignore some maintainers (really
don't). Just use b4 and everything should be fine, although remember
about `b4 prep --auto-to-cc` if you added new patches to the patchset.

You missed at least devicetree list (maybe more), so this won't be
tested by automated tooling. Performing review on untested code might be
a waste of time, thus I will skip this patch entirely till you follow
the process allowing the patch to be tested.

Best regards,
Krzysztof