linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] arm64: dts: add description for solidrun am642 som and hummingboard evb

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2024 09:52:18 +0530
From: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>
To: Josua Mayer <josua@...id-run.com>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
        Tero Kristo
	<kristo@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski
	<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
        Alexandre Belloni
	<alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
CC: Yazan Shhady <yazan.shhady@...id-run.com>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Krzysztof
 Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
        Suman Anna <s-anna@...com>,
        Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
        MD Danish Anwar
	<danishanwar@...com>, Andrew Davis <afd@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] arm64: dts: add description for solidrun am642 som
 and hummingboard evb

Hi,

On 18/02/24 19:48, Josua Mayer wrote:
> Am 13.02.24 um 07:12 schrieb Vignesh Raghavendra:
>> Hi
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> On 11/02/24 20:37, Josua Mayer wrote:
>>> ---
>>> Josua Mayer (4):
>>>        dt-bindings: arm: ti: Add bindings for SolidRun AM642
>>> HummingBoard-T

This goes via TI K3 arch tree

>>
>>>        dt-bindings: rtc: abx80x: convert to yaml
>>>        dt-bindings: iio: humidity: hdc20x0: add optional interrupts
>>> property
>>>        dt-bindings: mtd: spi-nor: add optional interrupts property
>> 2/5 needs to go via RTC subsystem tree. Could you split it out into its
>> own series when you respin
> Only rtc, or should I split out the other two as well?

Split others too. RTC, IIO and SPI-NOR related bindings should go via
respective trees. Please post them individually to appropriate lists.

Regards
Vignesh