[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <CZ93XYV3MB10.YRCFWLLHIICY@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2024 14:59:16 +0100
From: "Michael Walle" <mwalle@...nel.org>
To: "AngeloGioacchino Del Regno" <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
"Rob Herring" <robh@...nel.org>, "Krzysztof Kozlowski"
<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, "Conor Dooley" <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
"Matthias Brugger" <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
Cc: <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, "Sean Wang" <sean.wang@...iatek.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] arm64: dts: mediatek: add Kontron 3.5"-SBC-i1200
On Mon Feb 19, 2024 at 2:35 PM CET, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> >> vbus is always supplied by something, as otherwise USB won't work - whether this
> >> is an always-on regulator or a passthrough from external supply this doesn't really
> >> matter - you should model a regulator-fixed that provides the 5V VBUS line.
> >
> > I don't think this is correct, though. Think of an on-board USB
> > hub. There only D+/D- are connected (and maybe the USB3.2 SerDes
> > lanes). Or have a look at the M.2 pinout. There is no Vbus.
> >
>
> Yes but the MediaTek MTU3 and/or controllers do have it ;-)
. and ..
> >> For example:
> >> vbus_fixed: regulator-vbus {
> >> compatible = "regulator-fixed";
> >> regulator-name = "usb-vbus";
> >> regulator-always-on;
> >> regulator-boot-on;
> >> regulator-min-microvolt = <5000000>;
> >> regulator-max-microvolt = <5000000>;
> >> };
> >
> > As mentioned above, I don't think this will make sense in my case.
> > >> P.S.: If the rail has a different name, please use that different name. Obviously
> >> that requires you to have schematics at hand, and I don't know if you do: if you
> >> don't, then that regulator-vbus name is just fine.
> >
> > I do have the schematics.
>
> In that case, you should model the power tree with the fixed power lines,
> check mt8195-cherry (and/or cherry-tomato) and radxa-nio-12l; even though
> those are technically "doing nothing", this is device tree, so it should
> provide a description of the hardware ... and the board does have fixed
> power lines.
> It has at least one: DC-IN (typec, barrel jack or whatever, the board needs
> power, doesn't it?!).
Mh, maybe I don't get it. But within the hardware there is simply no
Vbus. Thus I'd argue it doesn't make sense to have a vbus-supply
property. Besides, the mediatek,mtu3.yaml binding lists it as
deprecated anyway and it should rather be on the connector. There,
it makes perfectly sense (at least if it's a USB connector).
Thus in my case, the xhci for the front port has a vbus-supply
property (but it should rather have a connector node, as I've just
learned). But the internal port which connects to the USB hub
shouldn't have one.
+-----+ +-----+ +------+
| |<--Dp/Dn-->| |<------Dp/Dn----->| USB |
| SoC | | | | Conn |
| | | | +-----+ | |
+-----+ | USB | | PWR |--Vbus->| |
| Hub | | SW | +------+
| | +-----+
| | ^
| | | PRTPWR
| |-----'
+-----+
"PWR SW" is a power switch, the input (+5V) isn't shown here. The
power will be enabled by the USB Hub.
-michael
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (253 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists