lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240219140505.85794-4-christophe.kerello@foss.st.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2024 15:05:05 +0100
From: Christophe Kerello <christophe.kerello@...s.st.com>
To: <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>, <richard@....at>, <vigneshr@...com>,
        <robh+dt@...nel.org>, <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        <conor+dt@...nel.org>
CC: <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Christophe Kerello <christophe.kerello@...s.st.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/3] mtd: rawnand: stm32_fmc2: add MP25 support

FMC2 IP supports up to 4 chip select. On MP1 SoC, only 2 of them are
available when on MP25 SoC, the 4 chip select are available.

Let's use a platform data structure for parameters that will differ.

Signed-off-by: Christophe Kerello <christophe.kerello@...s.st.com>
---
Changes in v2:
 - V1 patch 10, 11 and 12 have been squashed and reworked.
 - a platform data structure is handling the difference between MP1 and MP25.

 drivers/mtd/nand/raw/stm32_fmc2_nand.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/stm32_fmc2_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/stm32_fmc2_nand.c
index a7db7b675514..264556939a00 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/stm32_fmc2_nand.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/stm32_fmc2_nand.c
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
 #include <linux/module.h>
 #include <linux/mtd/rawnand.h>
 #include <linux/of_address.h>
+#include <linux/of_device.h>
 #include <linux/pinctrl/consumer.h>
 #include <linux/platform_device.h>
 #include <linux/regmap.h>
@@ -37,7 +38,7 @@
 #define FMC2_MAX_SG			16
 
 /* Max chip enable */
-#define FMC2_MAX_CE			2
+#define FMC2_MAX_CE			4
 
 /* Max ECC buffer length */
 #define FMC2_MAX_ECC_BUF_LEN		(FMC2_BCHDSRS_LEN * FMC2_MAX_SG)
@@ -243,6 +244,13 @@ static inline struct stm32_fmc2_nand *to_fmc2_nand(struct nand_chip *chip)
 	return container_of(chip, struct stm32_fmc2_nand, chip);
 }
 
+struct stm32_fmc2_nfc;
+
+struct stm32_fmc2_nfc_data {
+	int max_ncs;
+	int (*set_cdev)(struct stm32_fmc2_nfc *nfc);
+};
+
 struct stm32_fmc2_nfc {
 	struct nand_controller base;
 	struct stm32_fmc2_nand nand;
@@ -256,6 +264,7 @@ struct stm32_fmc2_nfc {
 	phys_addr_t data_phys_addr[FMC2_MAX_CE];
 	struct clk *clk;
 	u8 irq_state;
+	const struct stm32_fmc2_nfc_data *data;
 
 	struct dma_chan *dma_tx_ch;
 	struct dma_chan *dma_rx_ch;
@@ -1809,7 +1818,7 @@ static int stm32_fmc2_nfc_parse_child(struct stm32_fmc2_nfc *nfc,
 			return ret;
 		}
 
-		if (cs >= FMC2_MAX_CE) {
+		if (cs >= nfc->data->max_ncs) {
 			dev_err(nfc->dev, "invalid reg value: %d\n", cs);
 			return -EINVAL;
 		}
@@ -1915,9 +1924,17 @@ static int stm32_fmc2_nfc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	nand_controller_init(&nfc->base);
 	nfc->base.ops = &stm32_fmc2_nfc_controller_ops;
 
-	ret = stm32_fmc2_nfc_set_cdev(nfc);
-	if (ret)
-		return ret;
+	nfc->data = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
+	if (!nfc->data)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	if (nfc->data->set_cdev) {
+		ret = nfc->data->set_cdev(nfc);
+		if (ret)
+			return ret;
+	} else {
+		nfc->cdev = dev->parent;
+	}
 
 	ret = stm32_fmc2_nfc_parse_dt(nfc);
 	if (ret)
@@ -1936,7 +1953,7 @@ static int stm32_fmc2_nfc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	if (nfc->dev == nfc->cdev)
 		start_region = 1;
 
-	for (chip_cs = 0, mem_region = start_region; chip_cs < FMC2_MAX_CE;
+	for (chip_cs = 0, mem_region = start_region; chip_cs < nfc->data->max_ncs;
 	     chip_cs++, mem_region += 3) {
 		if (!(nfc->cs_assigned & BIT(chip_cs)))
 			continue;
@@ -2092,7 +2109,7 @@ static int __maybe_unused stm32_fmc2_nfc_resume(struct device *dev)
 
 	stm32_fmc2_nfc_wp_disable(nand);
 
-	for (chip_cs = 0; chip_cs < FMC2_MAX_CE; chip_cs++) {
+	for (chip_cs = 0; chip_cs < nfc->data->max_ncs; chip_cs++) {
 		if (!(nfc->cs_assigned & BIT(chip_cs)))
 			continue;
 
@@ -2105,9 +2122,28 @@ static int __maybe_unused stm32_fmc2_nfc_resume(struct device *dev)
 static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(stm32_fmc2_nfc_pm_ops, stm32_fmc2_nfc_suspend,
 			 stm32_fmc2_nfc_resume);
 
+static const struct stm32_fmc2_nfc_data stm32_fmc2_nfc_mp1_data = {
+	.max_ncs = 2,
+	.set_cdev = stm32_fmc2_nfc_set_cdev,
+};
+
+static const struct stm32_fmc2_nfc_data stm32_fmc2_nfc_mp25_data = {
+	.max_ncs = 4,
+};
+
 static const struct of_device_id stm32_fmc2_nfc_match[] = {
-	{.compatible = "st,stm32mp15-fmc2"},
-	{.compatible = "st,stm32mp1-fmc2-nfc"},
+	{
+		.compatible = "st,stm32mp15-fmc2",
+		.data = &stm32_fmc2_nfc_mp1_data,
+	},
+	{
+		.compatible = "st,stm32mp1-fmc2-nfc",
+		.data = &stm32_fmc2_nfc_mp1_data,
+	},
+	{
+		.compatible = "st,stm32mp25-fmc2-nfc",
+		.data = &stm32_fmc2_nfc_mp25_data,
+	},
 	{}
 };
 MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, stm32_fmc2_nfc_match);
-- 
2.25.1


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ