[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANXhq0odPmhqsWA8hNqbH8+0ShJjUJktXNC1vxidpwjct+sdCg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2024 22:36:39 +0800
From: Zong Li <zong.li@...ive.com>
To: palmer@...belt.com, paul.walmsley@...ive.com, alex@...ti.fr,
conor.dooley@...rochip.com, aou@...s.berkeley.edu,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] riscv: add CALLER_ADDRx support
On Fri, Feb 2, 2024 at 9:51 AM Zong Li <zong.li@...ive.com> wrote:
>
> CALLER_ADDRx returns caller's address at specified level, they are used
> for several tracers. These macros eventually use
> __builtin_return_address(n) to get the caller's address if arch doesn't
> define their own implementation.
>
> In RISC-V, __builtin_return_address(n) only works when n == 0, we need
> to walk the stack frame to get the caller's address at specified level.
>
> data.level started from 'level + 3' due to the call flow of getting
> caller's address in RISC-V implementation. If we don't have additional
> three iteration, the level is corresponding to follows:
>
> callsite -> return_address -> arch_stack_walk -> walk_stackframe
> | | | |
> level 3 level 2 level 1 level 0
>
> Fixes: 10626c32e382 ("riscv/ftrace: Add basic support")
>
> Reviewed-by: Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@...osinc.com>
> Signed-off-by: Zong Li <zong.li@...ive.com>
> ---
>
> Changed in v2:
> - Rebase to v6.8-rc2
> - Add noinline attribute for return_address()
> - Add a fixes tag
>
> arch/riscv/include/asm/ftrace.h | 5 ++++
> arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile | 2 ++
> arch/riscv/kernel/return_address.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 55 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 arch/riscv/kernel/return_address.c
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/ftrace.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/ftrace.h
> index 329172122952..15055f9df4da 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/ftrace.h
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/ftrace.h
> @@ -25,6 +25,11 @@
>
> #define ARCH_SUPPORTS_FTRACE_OPS 1
> #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
> +
> +extern void *return_address(unsigned int level);
> +
> +#define ftrace_return_address(n) return_address(n)
> +
> void MCOUNT_NAME(void);
> static inline unsigned long ftrace_call_adjust(unsigned long addr)
> {
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile b/arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile
> index f71910718053..604d6bf7e476 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile
> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ ifdef CONFIG_FTRACE
> CFLAGS_REMOVE_ftrace.o = $(CC_FLAGS_FTRACE)
> CFLAGS_REMOVE_patch.o = $(CC_FLAGS_FTRACE)
> CFLAGS_REMOVE_sbi.o = $(CC_FLAGS_FTRACE)
> +CFLAGS_REMOVE_return_address.o = $(CC_FLAGS_FTRACE)
> endif
> CFLAGS_syscall_table.o += $(call cc-option,-Wno-override-init,)
> CFLAGS_compat_syscall_table.o += $(call cc-option,-Wno-override-init,)
> @@ -46,6 +47,7 @@ obj-y += irq.o
> obj-y += process.o
> obj-y += ptrace.o
> obj-y += reset.o
> +obj-y += return_address.o
> obj-y += setup.o
> obj-y += signal.o
> obj-y += syscall_table.o
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/return_address.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/return_address.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..c8115ec8fb30
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/return_address.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> +/*
> + * This code come from arch/arm64/kernel/return_address.c
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2023 SiFive.
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/export.h>
> +#include <linux/kprobes.h>
> +#include <linux/stacktrace.h>
> +
> +struct return_address_data {
> + unsigned int level;
> + void *addr;
> +};
> +
> +static bool save_return_addr(void *d, unsigned long pc)
> +{
> + struct return_address_data *data = d;
> +
> + if (!data->level) {
> + data->addr = (void *)pc;
> + return false;
> + }
> +
> + --data->level;
> +
> + return true;
> +}
> +NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(save_return_addr);
> +
> +noinline void *return_address(unsigned int level)
> +{
> + struct return_address_data data;
> +
> + data.level = level + 3;
> + data.addr = NULL;
> +
> + arch_stack_walk(save_return_addr, &data, current, NULL);
> +
> + if (!data.level)
> + return data.addr;
> + else
> + return NULL;
> +
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(return_address);
> +NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(return_address);
> --
> 2.17.1
>
Hi all,
Is there anything that can be improved in this patch? Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists