linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] selftests/mqueue: Set timeout to 100 seconds

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f7db39bd-d11e-4854-8b6e-2543aeec1d70@amazon.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2024 15:06:42 +0000
From: "Mohamed Abuelfotoh, Hazem" <abuehaze@...zon.com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org>
CC: <shuah@...nel.org>, <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
	<Vijaikumar_Kanagarajan@...tor.com>, <brauner@...nel.org>,
	<jlayton@...nel.org>, <jack@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests/mqueue: Set timeout to 100 seconds

On 17/02/2024 00:01, Kees Cook wrote:

> 
> Should it be 100 or 180? Either way:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
> 
> --
> Kees Cook

Both options may work, I am more inclined to have this as 180 seconds by 
giving more time for the test to finish, this can be reduced later to 
100 or something else if we start hearing complains about the new timeout.

Hazem