[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <mb61p34topjsn.fsf@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2024 15:15:20 +0000
From: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@...il.com>
To: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@...weicloud.com>, ast@...nel.org,
daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org, martin.lau@...ux.dev,
song@...nel.org, catalin.marinas@....com, mark.rutland@....com,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, kpsingh@...nel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v7 1/2] arm64: patching: implement text_poke API
Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@...weicloud.com> writes:
> On 1/25/2024 9:31 PM, Puranjay Mohan wrote:
>> The text_poke API is used to implement functions like memcpy() and
>> memset() for instruction memory (RO+X). The implementation is similar to
>> the x86 version.
>>
>> This will be used by the BPF JIT to write and modify BPF programs. There
>> could be more users of this in the future.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@...il.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/include/asm/patching.h | 2 +
>> arch/arm64/kernel/patching.c | 80 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 82 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/patching.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/patching.h
>> index 68908b82b168..587bdb91ab7a 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/patching.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/patching.h
>> @@ -8,6 +8,8 @@ int aarch64_insn_read(void *addr, u32 *insnp);
>> int aarch64_insn_write(void *addr, u32 insn);
>>
>> int aarch64_insn_write_literal_u64(void *addr, u64 val);
>> +void *aarch64_insn_set(void *dst, u32 insn, size_t len);
>> +void *aarch64_insn_copy(void *dst, void *src, size_t len);
>>
>> int aarch64_insn_patch_text_nosync(void *addr, u32 insn);
>> int aarch64_insn_patch_text(void *addrs[], u32 insns[], int cnt);
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/patching.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/patching.c
>> index b4835f6d594b..5c2d34d890cf 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/patching.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/patching.c
>> @@ -105,6 +105,86 @@ noinstr int aarch64_insn_write_literal_u64(void *addr, u64 val)
>> return ret;
>> }
>>
>> +typedef void text_poke_f(void *dst, void *src, size_t patched, size_t len);
>> +
>
> How about removing the argument 'patched' and passing 'src + patched' as the
> second argument?
>
The memcpy() function needs 'src + patched' but the memset() needs only the 'src' and
will ignore the 'patched'. To make these implementations generic, I pass
both src and patched separately and allow the implementation of
text_poke_f() to use them.
If you think there is a better way to implement this then I would love
to use that.
>> +static void *__text_poke(text_poke_f func, void *addr, void *src, size_t len)
>> +{
>> + unsigned long flags;
>> + size_t patched = 0;
>> + size_t size;
>> + void *waddr;
>> + void *ptr;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&patch_lock, flags);
>> +
>> + while (patched < len) {
>> + ptr = addr + patched;
>> + size = min_t(size_t, PAGE_SIZE - offset_in_page(ptr),
>> + len - patched);
>> +
>> + waddr = patch_map(ptr, FIX_TEXT_POKE0);
>> + func(waddr, src, patched, size);
>> + patch_unmap(FIX_TEXT_POKE0);
>> +
>> + if (ret < 0) {
>
> Where is 'ret' assigned?
>
Will remove the error check in next version as func() is of type void
and this error check was left from the previous version.
Thanks,
Puranjay
Powered by blists - more mailing lists