lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87sf1o8oh2.ffs@tglx>
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2024 16:26:17 +0100
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@...cle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: peterz@...radead.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, paulmck@...nel.org,
 akpm@...ux-foundation.org, luto@...nel.org, bp@...en8.de,
 dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, hpa@...or.com, mingo@...hat.com,
 juri.lelli@...hat.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org, willy@...radead.org,
 mgorman@...e.de, jpoimboe@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
 jgross@...e.com, andrew.cooper3@...rix.com, bristot@...nel.org,
 mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, geert@...ux-m68k.org,
 glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de, anton.ivanov@...bridgegreys.com,
 mattst88@...il.com, krypton@...ich-teichert.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
 David.Laight@...LAB.COM, richard@....at, mjguzik@...il.com,
 jon.grimm@....com, bharata@....com, raghavendra.kt@....com,
 boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com, konrad.wilk@...cle.com, Ankur Arora
 <ankur.a.arora@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/30] sched: *_tsk_need_resched() now takes resched_t
 as param

On Mon, Feb 12 2024 at 21:55, Ankur Arora wrote:

The subject line reads odd...

> -static inline bool test_tsk_need_resched(struct task_struct *tsk)
> +static inline bool test_tsk_need_resched(struct task_struct *tsk, resched_t rs)
>  {
> -	return unlikely(test_tsk_thread_flag(tsk,TIF_NEED_RESCHED));
> +	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_AUTO) || rs == NR_now)
> +		return unlikely(test_tsk_thread_flag(tsk, tif_resched(rs)));
> +	else
> +		return false;
>  }

Same like the others. This wants wrappers with now/lazy.
  
>  /*
> @@ -2104,7 +2121,8 @@ static __always_inline bool need_resched(void)
>  
>  static __always_inline bool need_resched_lazy(void)
>  {
> -	return unlikely(tif_need_resched(NR_lazy));
> +	return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_AUTO) &&
> +		unlikely(tif_need_resched(NR_lazy));

Shouldn't this be folded into the patch which adds need_resched_lazy()?

Thanks,

        tglx

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ