| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2024 19:05:20 -0800 From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> To: Byungchul Park <byungchul@...com> Cc: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>, mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, juri.lelli@...hat.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org, dietmar.eggemann@....com, rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com, mgorman@...e.de, bristot@...hat.com, vschneid@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, kernel_team@...ynix.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] sched/numa, mm: do not try to migrate memory to memoryless nodes On Tue, 20 Feb 2024 10:53:43 +0900 Byungchul Park <byungchul@...com> wrote: > > > IIUC, you will use patch as fix to the issue in > > > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240216111502.79759-1-byungchul@sk.com/ > > > > > > If so, we need the Fixes: tag to make it land in -stable properly. > > > > Yes, this changelog is missing rather a lot of important information. > > This is not the root cause fix any more but just optimization. It would have been helpful to have told us this in the changelog :( > That's > why I didn't add Fixes: tag and cc stable@...r.kernel.org in here. > > Instead, I added Fixes: tag and cc'ed stable@...r.kernel.org in the real > fix patch. check the following link please: > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240216111502.79759-1-byungchul@sk.com/ But doesn't this patch "sched/numa, mm: do not try to migrate memory to memoryless nodes" also fix the bug? Do we truly need both?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists